New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
EPA Letter and backup
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Operating
>
2011
>
EPA Letter and backup
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2011 1:36:28 PM
Creation date
8/18/2011 1:35:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
Fiscal_Year
2011
PW_Division
Engineering
GL_Fund
131
GL_ORG
9340
GL_Grant
621
GL_Project_Number
300316
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 3 <br />CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIAL <br />PROCUREMENT METHODS AND EXEMPTIONS FROM COMPETITION <br />The Board, upon its own initiative, or upon request of a Solicitation Agent, may create special <br />selection, evaluation and award procedures for, or may exempt from competition the award of, a <br />specific contract or class of contracts as provided in this Article 3. <br />SS <br />3.1. <br />PECIALOLICITATION <br />3.1 .1BAASM. <br /> The approval of a <br />ASIS FOR PPROVAL OF LTERNATE ELECTION ETHOD <br />special Solicitation method, including, but not limited to, direct appointment, must be <br />based upon a record before the Board that contains the following: <br />(a) The nature of the contract or class of contracts for which the special Solicitation <br />or exemption is requested; <br />(b) Estimated Contract Price or cost of the project, if relevant; <br />(c) Findings to support the substantial cost savings, enhancement in quality or <br />performance, or other public benefit anticipated by the proposed selection <br />method or exemption from competitive Solicitation; <br />(d) Findings to support the reason that approval of the request would be unlikely to <br />encourage favoritism or diminish competition for the Public Contract or class of <br />Public Contracts, or would otherwise substantially promote the public interest in <br />a manner that could not practicably be realized by complying with the <br />Solicitation requirements that are applicable under these regulations; <br />(e) A description of the proposed alternative contracting methods to be employed, <br />and <br />(f) The estimated date by which it would be necessary to let the contract(s). <br />In making a determination regarding a special selection method, the Board may <br />consider the type, cost, amount of the contract or class of contracts, number of <br />persons available to make Offers, and such other factors as it may deem appropriate. <br />3.1 .2 RSSSMFP <br />ECORD UPPORTING PECIAL OLICITATION ETHOD ORUBLIC <br />I. <br />The record supporting a special solicitation method for a Public <br />MPROVEMENT <br />Improvement contract shall include the defining characteristics of the contract or <br />class, such as the project description or location, time periods, contract values, <br />methods of procurement or other factors that distinguish the limited and related class <br />of Public Improvement contracts from the city’s overall construction program. The <br />city may not identify a class solely by funding source, such as a particular bond fund, <br />or by the method of procurement, but shall identify the class using characteristics that <br />reasonably relate to the exemption criteria set forth in Section 3.1. <br />H <br />3.2. <br />EARING <br />Article 3 Contract Review Board Exemption Process Page 6 <br />Exhibit A to Administrative Order No. 44-08-06-F <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.