New Search
reference, but it does not appear to have any hours billed by Vickie this month. There is an employee ID column which <br /> identifies who billed the time. So the invoice has the employee, dates, and hours billed, we would just need to add the <br /> work activity for each date - similar to Lloyd's or Craig's summary below. Thanks. Russ <br /> From: GIBONS Craig [mailto:Craig.Gibons@ci.coburg.or.us] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:37 PM <br /> To: ROYER Russ C <br /> Subject: RE: Billing information <br /> This will work fine, just please make sure the hours documented tie into the hours on the invoice backup, so 1 do not <br /> have to come back for clarification. Thanks for doing this Russ. <br /> From: ROYER Russ C [mailto:Russ.C.ROYER@ci.eugene.or.us] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:08 PM <br /> To: GIBONS Craig; MECHAM Milo R <br /> Cc: WILLIAMS Lloyd L; BARNTS Vickie L <br /> Subject: FW: Billing information <br /> Hi Craig, I know you said it was fine to begin tracking from here on out, but Lloyd had already split out his hours. Does <br /> this appear to be what you were thinking of or might you have something else in mind? I just received the billing <br /> statement to review for the month of May, so I will attach a copy of this email with Lloyd's-breakdown to return with <br /> that billing statement as it includes the month of May. On project appraisal work a significant amount of the research <br /> applies to several parcels so it is more difficult to separate out. The negotiations tend to be more specific to each <br /> parcel. We expect to soon receive the final maps to finish the appraisal report and prepare acquisition packages. Prior <br /> to making offers we will let you know what our appraisals are indicating; perhaps review the basis to the value findings, <br /> and obtain your approvals. Thanks. Russ <br /> From: WILLIAMS Lloyd L <br /> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:42 AM <br /> <br /> To: WILLIAMS Lloyd L; ROYER Russ C <br /> Cc: BARNTS Vickie L ' <br /> Subject: RE: Billing information <br /> Here is an attempt to break down my hours in the COBURG project from March 18 -6/512009 (122.5 hrsl: <br /> Simms: Minimal research time and minimal sales study (2 hr) <br /> Whitaker-Jones: Research time to study current zoning vs. plan designation (4 hrs); comparable sale study {with <br /> Stevenson and Serenity Lane): (9 hrs) <br /> Bergold: Research time (split with Minter and Hellemn): (3 hrs); Comparable sales study/photos (split with Minter and <br /> Hellemn): (9 hrs) Met in field w/owner (2 hrs) NEED MAPS <br /> Minter: Research time (split with Hellemn and Bergold): {3 hrs); Comparable sales study (split with Hellemn and <br /> Bergold}: (8 hrs) <br /> Hellemn: Research time (split with Bergold and Minter): (3 hrs); Comparable sales study (split with Bergold and <br /> Minter): (8 hrs) <br /> Serenity Lane: Research time and sales study completed (w/ Whitaker-Jones comparable sales study}: (9 hrs) <br /> Stevenson: Research time and comparable study (split with Whitaker-Jones): (9 hrs). <br /> Coburg 5 LLC: Research time and comparable sales study (split with MBM Group): (27.5 hrs) have maps and APPRAISAL <br /> NEARLY DONE <br /> MBM Group: Research time and comparable sales study combined with Coburg 5 {20 hrs) HOLD <br /> Knee Deep: minimal research time and minimal comp study time {2 hr) <br /> Meyer: Minimal research time and minimal comp study time (2 hr) <br /> Muddy Creek: Minimal research time and minimal comp study time (2 hr) <br /> 2 <br /> <br />