New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
GJN4628 PWP-003330
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Capital
>
2009
>
GJN4628 PWP-003330
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 4:59:07 AM
Creation date
7/28/2009 5:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Invoices-Payments & Receivables
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GJN
004628
GL_Project_Number
374628
Identification_Number
PWP-003330
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: WILLIAMS Lloyd L <br /> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 11:10 AM <br /> To: ROYER Russ C <br /> Cc: BARNTS Vickie L <br /> Subject: RE: Billing information <br /> The field inspections and appraisal reports are nearly finished on Ber~old and Coburg 5 (Truck 'n Travel). I have the <br /> take areas map for Coburg 5 but do not have the map vet for Bergold. All comps have been located and photos taken. <br /> I can allocate the hours and give an accounting for the balance. of the hours. The comp searches are pretty much. <br /> complete for the balance of the properties and good starts have been made on those appraisals. We just need their go <br /> ahead to proceed. I can break-those properties out also, and I should have all those numbers later today. <br /> From: ROYER Russ C <br /> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:38 AM <br /> To: WILLIAMS Lloyd L; BARNTS Vickie L <br /> Subject: FW: Billing information <br /> Let's see if we can start tracking some of the specifics. I'll explain up to now it has pretty well all been overall appraisal <br /> comp searches, and drafting of all the appraisals, with some extra time spent on the 2 parcels we have the notice to <br /> proceed. Lloyd, could you tell me those 2 names again? Or if you have other ideas to reference specific ownerships <br /> that would be great also. <br /> From: GIBONS Craig [mailto:Craig.Gibons@ci.coburg.or.us] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 4:03 PM <br /> To: ROYER Russ C <br /> Cc: MECHAM Milo R <br /> Subject: RE: Billing information <br /> Russ. thank you. <br /> If at all possible, I would appreciate a brief log of how the time is being spent to accompany each invoice - just a diary <br /> with essential info: <br /> Date, Activity, Hours, water or wastewater <br /> June 18, site visit to smith property 5 hours Water <br /> <br /> .June 19, negotiations with Montgomery 3 hours Wastewater <br /> Thank you. <br /> From: ROYER Russ C [mailto:Russ.C.ROYER@ci.eugene.or.us] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:47 AM . <br /> To: GIBONS Craig <br /> Cc: MECHAM Milo R <br /> Subject: FW: Billing information <br /> Good morning Craig, Milo explained Coburg needed an allocation between the wastewater easements and the <br /> waterline easements. To date our staff have mostly been accumulating comparable sales data, setting up acquisition <br /> files, and preparing drafts of the.appraisal reports in preparation for receipt of the final take area maps. There was <br /> minimal additional time spent setting up the file, ordering pre-lims and gathering sales data for the waterline <br /> easements. The appraisal was not drafted on that the waterline easements. In March and April there was a total of 65 <br /> hours billed to the city (22 hrs March and 43 hrs April). for total billed services of $6,248 ($2,112 + $4,136). Of that it is <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.