New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-04-15
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-04-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 9:44:44 AM
Creation date
6/4/2009 8:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
POS
Document_Date
7/20/2004
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
sculpting of the ground to provide visual interest as long as it was not too high and it maintained the `open <br />feeling' of the site. <br />Several people cited the need for shade trees in the park. Currently there are no trees on the site. Some said <br />they would like to see native trees and shrubs planted in the park. The enhanced open waterway through the <br />site is seen as a prime opportunity for developing a native landscape theme. Some did caution that the site <br />should not be over planted to the point that it does not feel safe. State Street Park was cited as an example <br />of a park that was too `shrubby' and over planted. <br />Conclusions <br />Based on the testimony heard, it is clear that there are four major interest areas for. Candlelight Park: (1) <br />developing the open waterway with a focus on native plantings that can provide the opportunity for wildlife <br />habitat; (2) keeping a dog off leash area in the park that will continue to provide dogs and their people with <br />a quality experience; (3) providing limited sport field opportunities that maintain an open space feeling and <br />multiple use potential; and (4) developing an active use area that includes playgrounds, picnic shelter, and <br />space suitable for neighborhood gatherings. <br />Maintaining user safety was an overriding concern for all areas of the park. Lighting was seen as beneficial, <br />especially along paths and in activity areas. The park should be designed for maximum visibility from the <br />street frontages and keep an open feeling. <br />. There is a concern regarding having sufficient and conveniently located parking for park users, especially <br />for accessible parking and parking for dog park users. In addition to being costly, developing on site <br />parking may not be permitted by the Eugene Zoning Ordinance standards for neighborhood parks. Further <br />evaluation of the amount of curb side parking and zoning standards will be needed. <br />Developing a meaningful open water way through the park site will likely require a significant budget <br />allocation, not to mention the cost of providing footbridges and the mitigation credits for the lost wetland. <br />Supplemental funding should be explored to help with this portion of the project. <br />With an apparently strong support group for the dog off leash area, consideration should be given to <br />develop this feature with the V.I.P. program (Volunteers In Parks). This could be approached in the same <br />manner that the Alton Baker Park Dog Park was constructed, which can serve as a successful model for <br />involvement. <br />Closing <br />Participants were reminded that there would be at least one more public meeting in which a draft master <br />plan..will. be presented_for discussion. It was.. estimated that this second meeting would be scheduled later. in__ <br />the winter. Announcement would be made prior to the meeting to all interested parties. All interested <br />parties were reminded that they are welcome to discuss this project or submit comments anytime on this <br />master plan process by phone; email, or surface mail. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.