New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Admin Order 58-04-15
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Admin Orders
>
Admin Order 58-04-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 9:44:44 AM
Creation date
6/4/2009 8:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Admin Orders
PW_Subject
POS
Document_Date
7/20/2004
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
was expressed not to have a small dog park area since that would result in a crowded, muddy, and messy <br />area. The dog off leash area at Amazon Park was used as an example of an area that was too small at <br />approximately 2.5 acres. Even at the size of the more recently developed dog off leash area in Alton Baker <br />Park, 4 acres, degradation has occurred to the turf. It was discussed that improved drainage and irrigation <br />maybe necessary to help the turf withstand the constant year round use that dog off leash areas receive. <br />A statement was made that people come with their dogs from south and east Eugene to use the Candlelight <br />off leash area. Several people lobbied for at least half (5.5 acres) of the Candlelight park to be designated as <br />an off leash dog park on the master plan, while others said that no more than half of the park should be <br />reserved for the dog off leash use. Everyone present felt that whatever the size, the dog off leash area <br />should be made accessible: <br />A suggestion was made to consider using the southwest corner of the park site as the dog off leash area. It <br />has a natural separation from the rest of the park site by the existing open drainage way. Access from the <br />north and east would need to be provided by a footbridge over the drainage way. Providing shade in dog off <br />leash area was considered important. Shade trees and a covered gazebo or shelter was proposed. Other <br />amenities such as drinking fountains, benches, etc were mentioned as desirable. <br />The idea of developing sports fields at Candlelight did not receive much support from the people in <br />attendance. Even though people were told that the City had long believed that this park due to its size and <br />flat topography would be an ideal site to locate sports fields, there was not much sympathy among the <br />group to see this happen. People were more opposed to seeing a ball field than a soccer field. In fact, after <br />some discussion, the group stated that they would not mind seeing soccer fields since such a space had <br />multiple use value. When not used for game play, it would provide open space for other informal activities. <br />Ball fields were considered a more formal use that required more infrastructure, and did not lend <br />themselves readily to alternate uses. <br />While on the site posting for the first public meeting, a neighbor approached staff and briefly provided <br />some viewpoints. While being happy to see the site finally developed for a variety of uses, he felt that <br />providing facilities for active play such as basketball and soccer were especially important. <br />One person expressed an interest in seeing wildlife habitat developed in the park. Since the site has been <br />maintained over its history as a rough mown field, there is little existing habitat value. Any significant <br />habitat would need to be created. A logical location for this would be along the open waterway corridor that <br />runs through the park. <br />PARK LANDSCAPE <br />The `wetland' status of the park site was discussed. A wetland delineation was performed which <br />documented approximately''/2 acre of low quality wetland. Most of the wetland is located on the eastside of <br />the park, approximately halfway between its north and south boundaries. A very small amount of wetland <br />is documented along the bottom of the small open drainageway that traverses through the park site. The <br />City is planning on purchasing mitigation credits in the West Eugene Wetland Mitigation Bank in order to <br />develop the park. The cost to purchase these credits is estimated to be approximately $25,000. <br />The open drainageway through the park is one of the upper reaches of the Greenhill Tributary, which is <br />undergoing coordinated enhancement improvements. As part of that overall program, the City is planning <br />on creating an enhanced waterway through Candlelight Park. Design options will be explored which will <br />lay back the steep banks of the waterway, open up or widen portions, meander its alignment to fit around <br />other uses in the park, and plant native vegetation that will hopefully create habitat and stormwater <br />filtration value. The open waterway will likely require at least a couple of pedestrian crossings, with <br />footbridges being preferred over culvert crossings. <br />Candlelight Park is a flat site with little or no topographic relief. A short discussion addressed the idea of <br />modifying the site grades. People did not want to see extensive mounding that could result in `hiding' <br />places for undesirable activities. Admittedly though, the audience did see benefit in some low height <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.