|
,_ ~ Section 5
<br />Airlines
<br />Airlines used at Portland International Airport
<br />Of the Eugene Airport catchment area survey travelers who used Portland International Airport, Alaska
<br />-~ Airlines/Horizon Air captured the largest share of the top 25 destinations with 30.7 percent and 23.1
<br />percent in the total survey. United Airlines ranked second among top 25 destinations travelers with a
<br />'~ 26.1 percent share and an overall leading share of 21.8 percent. Delta Air Lines ranked third with 9.0
<br />::..~ percent of the travelers destined for the top 25 destinations and 10.6 percent of travelers to all
<br />destinations. Southwest Airlines did not make the top five in the survey. However, Southwest Airlines
<br />_~ has a high percentage of bookings through their proprietary website and reservations offices and are
<br />~. most likely underrepresented in this survey.
<br />-~ Access to additional hubs and the greater number of nonstop markets as well as lower fares in some
<br />instances appear to be major factors in diverting catchment area passengers to Portland International
<br />Airport. In comparison to the 2004 Passenger Demand Analysis, market share of diverting passengers
<br />changed minimally.
<br /> Table 5.2 Airlines used at Portland International Airport
<br /> `Rank Destinations United Horizon Air/ ' Delta American ' America 30ther Total
<br />~~~
<br /> Alaska West ~
<br /> Pa;, P~,a % Pax % Pax % Pax % Pax %
<br />7 Pax
<br />
<br />1
<br />Las Vey~s, NV
<br />11r
<br />8.0
<br />1,019
<br />F9.9
<br />0
<br />0.0
<br />0
<br />0.0
<br />192
<br />13.2 130
<br />89 _
<br />1,458
<br />'. ~ 2 LosAngcle.s. CA 6r1 C1.J 553 ~5.1' 4 0.3 10, 0.8, 6 0:5~ "19 ~"~~~~1'.5 1,293
<br />
<br />:~
<br />Honolulu, HI
<br />100
<br />1 L4
<br />3
<br />0.3I
<br />24
<br />2.7
<br />0
<br />0.0
<br />0 -.~~,
<br />0.0 75:1 m,~
<br />85:5 w,~
<br />. ,_-~...
<br />878
<br />' ~ 4 Phoeni~~, AZ r4 7.7 310 .17.5` 5 0.6 3 0.4 400 48.4, 45
<br />.
<br />:.......
<br />. 54 827
<br /> 5 Chicago O'Hare, IL 6~b , 3.3 43 5.4 17 2.1 43. 5.4 28 .
<br />.
<br />3.5,.
<br />43 5 4 802
<br />~~ 6 Orlando, FL L55 32.0 44 5.5 219 27.4 71 8.9 46 5.8~ 163 20.4 798
<br /> San Diego. CA 17r '2.8 542 69.8 6 0.8, 9 1.2 32 4.110 ~1.3 X 776
<br />~~ 8 Kahului, HI 67 9.6 5 0.7 6 _ 0.9
<br />~ , 1' 0.1 0 0.0; 621. 88.7 700
<br /> 9 Denver, CO 329 51.5 164 25.7 3 0.5
<br />: 7- 1.1. 13° 2.Os 123 19.2 639
<br />
<br />10
<br />New Orleans. LA
<br />328
<br />52.6
<br />0
<br />0.0
<br />71.
<br />11.4
<br />76~
<br />12.2
<br />33 ~,
<br />5.3 116
<br />18.6 ~.
<br />624
<br />f~~ 11 aan Jose, C/~ n 0.0 583 99.0 0 0.0 0 OA 0 0.0' ~ 6 ~ 1 0 589
<br /> 12 Orange County. CA 27 47 543 94.1 0~ 0.0 4~ 0.7 2 0.3 1 ( 02' 577
<br />f 14 k;1~J
<br />1
<br />rC
<br />r
<br />l h1 23d 40
<br />7 l ( _....1 "47
<br />" µ~540
<br />
<br />~
<br />15 anru
<br />n
<br />e ~
<br />San Francisco. CA
<br />;; 36 .
<br />67.7
<br />153 .0
<br />,t0 8 49
<br />0 9.1;
<br />Q0. 235
<br />3 43.6
<br />0.6 64
<br />1 11.9,
<br />8_7
<br />0.2; 3
<br />0.6
<br />~ 539
<br />496
<br />""`] 16 Atlanta. GA 50 10.8 2 0.4= 318 68.4 11 2.4 33 71'~ ~51 11.0 465
<br /> 17 DallasiFt Worth. TX 36 8-0 4 0.9 ~ 144 _32.1 " 150 33.5 66 14 7 ~ 48 10 7 ~ _
<br />448
<br />~~ 18 Baltimore. f~.1D 199 50.1 1 0.3 38, 9.6: 13 3.3. 21. 5.3, 125 31.5 397
<br />
<br />19
<br />New York NFwark, NJ
<br />10(J
<br />25.8
<br />d0
<br />10.3
<br />13
<br />3.4
<br />3
<br />0.8.
<br />33 .,.~.:.
<br />8.5~ 198 ,.~
<br />51 2 .~_ .M._.~_
<br />387
<br />! 20 Fort Lauder ±ale. FL 106 27 4 1 0 3` 101 26.1 62 16.0 35 9.0~ 82
<br />~ 21 21 387
<br /> 21 Salt Lake C ity. UT 24 6? 1 u 3 301 7$.0 0' 0.0_ 3 0 8i
<br />57 14 g~ 386
<br />i ~ 22 Washington National, DC 132 3d.6 23 6.0: 46 12.0 2 0.5 76 19 9 103. ~27 0 _
<br />382
<br /> 23 Oakland. C A ~i 0.:~ 344 y0.5 ~ 0 0.0 2
<br />~ 0.5 0 0.0 33 8 7
<br />~ ~~ ~~380
<br />~~ 2=1 Houston Inter., TX 56 14.8 3 0.8 20 5.3` 6 1.6 32 8.4 262' 69 1
<br />, ~ 379
<br /> 25 Ontario, CA 1 ~ 3.3 3„6 31.1 ~ 6 1
<br />6 2 0
<br />5 4 1
<br />1 t
<br />91 2 4 389
<br />
<br />
<br />'~ Total Top 25 4,053 26.1 4,762 30.T 1,398 .
<br />9.0- 716 .
<br />4.6 1,148 .
<br />_ ~
<br />7.4 3439
<br />~.~_~~ 227 _1_5516
<br />,
<br /> Total t op 50 6,085 27.8 6,042 27.6 1,888" 8.6 1,174 5.4~ 1,377, 6.3i 5,356 24.41 2 1,922
<br /> Total survey 9,275 27.8 7,714 23.1 3,548. 10.6 2,273 6.8 2,01 96.0= 8,562 25.6 33,391
<br />r Source: MIDT survey data -calendar year 2004 . .
<br />EUGF.NF.
<br />AIRPORT
<br />Page 24
<br />
|