New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
2004 Passenger Demand Analysis Report
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
2004 Passenger Demand Analysis Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2009 10:50:50 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:31:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Airport
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Airport
Document_Date
5/13/2005
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Section 4 <br />Destinations <br />• ~ ~ • 'l~ <br />I~ This section of the Passenger DemandAnalysis investigates destinations associated with air travel from <br />the Eugene Airport catchment area. Additionally, the air travel destinations are grouped into geographic <br />regions to further understand the flow of air travel from the airport catchment area. <br />Catchment area top 25 destinations <br />'~ From the Eugene Airport catchment area, 49.3 percent of air travelers were destined for the top 25 <br />destinations and 67.4 percent of the total traffic was included in the top 50 destinations. The top 10 <br />destinations represented approximately 31.5 percent of the total market. Los Angeles was the number <br />;- one survey destination comprising 5.6 percent of the total survey air travelers. Las Vegas was the <br />second most popular survey destination with San Francisco rounding out the top three. Compared to the <br />2004 Passenger Demand Analysis (survey conducted for calendar year 2003), there was no change in <br />n ~ the top five destination standings and only the relative standings of the sixth through twenty-fifth <br />destinations changed. <br />Table 4.1 Catchment area top 25 destinations ,-..-~„ <br />r Rank Destination Passengers :Percent of Prior year analysis <br />sample Rank '% of sample <br />r ~ 1 Los Angeles, CA 3,976 5.6 1 ~ 5.7 <br />u_-.. <br />2 Las Vegas, NV 3,518- 5.0 2 ~ ~ 5.5 <br />i ~ 3 San Francisco CA 2,934 4.1 3 4.3 <br />4 Phoenix, AZ 2,414 3.4 4 3.4 <br />5 San Diego, CA ~ 2,041 2.9 5 <br />6 Chicago O'Hare IL 1,628 _ 2.3~ 8 ~~ ~ ~ 2.0{ <br />7 Denver, CO 1,604 2.3 6 ~~ 2.5 <br />8 SeattlelTacoma VVA 1,450 2.0 7 ~ ~~ 2.3 <br />9 Orlan4o. FL 1,397 ~ 2.0 9 ~ 1.9` <br />10 Orange County, CA 1,387 2.0 10,~ 1.8 <br />~ ~ 11 Honolulu, HI 1,199 1.7 11t~ ~~ 1.7 <br />12 New Orleans, LA 1,058` 1.5 12 1.4 <br />13 Kahului, NI 964 1.4~ 19. ~ 1.2 <br />14 Minneapolis, MN 964 1.4 16 1.2 <br />o ~ 15 Atlanta, GA 906 1~.3 14 ~ 1.2 <br />16 Salt Lake Ciry. UT 870 ~ 1.2 13 ~1.2. <br />i~ 17 Dalla~~Ft Worth, TX 866 1.2 17 ~ 1:2 <br />18 Washington Dulles, DC 828 1.2 18, ~ 1.2 <br />19 Sacramento, CA 802 1.1 21' 1.1 <br />~ 786. 1 1 . 24 . ° 1.0 <br />20 San Jose, CA <br />21 Oniano. CA 685 ~ 1 0 22) 1.1 <br />- 22 New York Newark NJ 676= 1.0 20 1.2 <br />2:; Boston, N1A 664 D.9 15~~ 1.21 <br />24 Palm Springs CA 663 ~ 0.9 23 ~ 1..0~ <br />25 Baltimore. MD 660 0.9 25 0.9~ <br />~~ Total top 25 34,940 49.3 NlA 50.3 <br />Total top 50 47,753 67.4 NIAa~ 68.8, <br />.~~m <br />Totat survey 70,869 100.0 NIA 100.0 <br />Source: MIDI survey data -calendar year 2004 <br />J <br />.~ ELGE.NF. Pa e 15 <br />AIRPORT g <br />r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.