New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Skinner Butte Park Master Plan
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Skinner Butte Park Master Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 1:14:22 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:27:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
POS
PWA_Project_Area
Miscellaneous
PW_Subject
Skinner Butte Park
Document_Date
1/31/2002
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Priorities Other Factors <br /> The Parks and Open Space bond measure There may be a logical sequence of <br /> allocated $300,000 for improvements to construction that influences whether or not <br /> Skinner Butte Park. Through the long-term, a project can be completed. Similarly, <br /> comprehensive scope of the master plan, many projects need a much higher level of <br /> many more projects have been identified funding than the Parks and Open Space <br /> than this funding will cover. Although a bond measure provides, and these projects , <br /> portion of the bond measure funding has become candidates for future funding The community was <br /> been allocated to support the master opportunities. Smaller projects that are <br /> planning process, priorities needed to be related to or dependent on these projects, asked to help set { <br /> identified for the balance of the available therefore, are also contingent on securing Ariorities !or how to ; <br /> funding. Several criteria were considered future funding. Projects that are better spend current <br /> in setting these priorities. ~ suited to volunteer efforts have also been funding <br /> i <br /> identified. In some cases, projects that can _ J <br /> Community Input be supported with a relatively small capital <br /> The community was invited to comment on investment, but generate a relatively large <br /> <br /> I general funding priorities atthe draft master amount of interest and stewardship in the ' " <br /> plan displays placed at various locations park, are seen as opportunities to extend <br /> around town for a period of two weeks (see current funding. Opportunities may exist , <br /> Master Plan Methodology, this chapter). to leverage existing funding through <br /> Immediately following the public displays, partnerships with other organizations or <br /> an exercise at the end of the third public programs, such as the City's <br /> workshop also encouraged meeting Comprehensive Stormwater Management L 1 <br /> participants to identify their top funding Program. As these opportunities are <br /> priorities from a detailed list of projects. identified, certain projects may become a <br /> higher priority to take advantage of the <br /> additional funding available through ~ t <br /> j partnerships. ` <br /> i <br /> ~ f ''i f I~~ <br /> ~ ~ t ~ <br /> <br /> i I M ~E b <br /> r i <br /> s~ t <br /> M.. r, { ~ ~K r t <br /> I I: <br /> I'. - <br /> Restoring of river bank habitat, and developing <br /> an interpretive hiking trail are top priorities for <br /> Parks and Open Space bond measure funding <br /> 1+ <br /> 16 Chapter I: Overvierw & Summary - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.