New Search
i <br /> training opportunities. The Wetlands Program Supervisor must also be adept at <br /> working in a collaborative, interagency setting to get satisfactory work products and <br /> quality from staff from partner agencies. <br /> 3. Anal sis of olicies, rules e. Park and O en S ace Rules ,procedures e. <br /> restoration techniques), and scientifically-based qualitative and quantitative data to <br /> determine one or more of the following: (a) if the Wetlands Program is adequately <br /> complying with them or meeting performance criteria; (b) if the Wetlands Program <br /> i should recommend changes to them to better reflect program and organizational <br /> objectives; (c) if the Wetlands Program needs to improve performance. <br /> 4. Analysis of funding needs and budgets. This requires an ability to understand <br /> ~ the budget process, how to forecast future expenses, and how to maintain costs <br /> within an adopted budget. <br /> 5. Analysis of wetland restoration project plans (including engineering documents <br /> and Environmental Assessments) to determine if the plans meet stated project goals, <br /> logistical realities, and requirements of local, State, and Federal laws. <br /> 6. Analysis of work program for the interagency wetlands Field Operations Group to <br /> determine if the work program meets annual goals and logistical realities. <br /> 7. Analysis of politically sensitive issues in amulti-agency framework. There are <br /> eight partners in the West Eugene Wetlands Partnership, and each partner agency <br /> has a unique mission and unique goals. At times, there are conflicting goals or <br /> objectives among the partner agencies. The Wetlands Program Supervisor works <br /> with professional staff from the partner agencies to identify these and seeks possible <br /> solutions. <br /> 8. Analysis of peer-reviewed scientific journals and synthesizes findings that are <br /> <br /> t applicable to the West Eugene Wetlands Program. <br /> 9. Analysis of aerial photos from various periods of time to assess vegetative and <br /> hydrological changes in site conditions, and to make recommendations on project <br /> actions based on the aerial photo interpretation. <br /> b. Describe the out come of your analysis (i.e., format, contents, results) and who receives the <br /> results of your analysis. <br /> There are a wide variety of outcomes to the analyses discussed above. These are the <br /> predominate outcomes: <br /> 1. White papers. A white paper is an in-depth analysis of a single topic with <br /> recommendations based on the analysis. A white paper may vary in length, but is <br /> typically 10-15 pages in length. White papers are usually provided to the Natural <br /> Resources Section Manager and Parks and Open Space Division Director, and <br /> possibly to managers from the BLM. <br /> 2. Grant applications. If an analysis identifies a need for external funding to address an <br /> Position Questionnaire Form 7 HRRS/Jan 99 <br /> <br />