New Search
COREY Kurt A <br /> From: TAYLOR Dennis M <br /> - Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:40 PM <br /> To: COREY Kurt A; CARLSON Jim R <br /> Cc: MILLER Dawna A <br /> ' Subject: FW: Response to Coburg issue for SEL discussion <br /> Categories: NoHTML <br /> I <br /> FYI--DMT <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: VANVACTOR William A <br /> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:18 PM <br /> To: KLOEPPEL George W <br /> Cc: TAYLOR Dennis M; KELLY Mike <br /> <br /> ii <br /> Subject: RE: Response to Coburg issue for SEL discussion <br /> George,. <br /> <br /> i <br /> Thank you for forwarding the background emails. On issues like this I try to copy both Mike and Dennis. I am not sure why <br /> it does not work the other way around. <br /> As to the merits, Faye and Bill would like to get to this, as I said in my earlier memo, as soon as practical. I actually agree <br /> with Susie's point that an impartial factual report from MWMC staff in the same packet as the request will greatly improve <br /> the likelihood for a positive response. A Joint elected official meeting date of August or Sept. will work for Lane County. If <br /> there were to be any delay beyond that time frame it may start to get problematic. <br /> Bill <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: KLOEPPEL George W <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:53 PM <br /> To: VANVACTOR William A <br /> Subject: FW: Response to Coburg issue for SEL discussion <br /> Bill, it wasn't clear that you received this communication. Particularly because of Faye's energy around this issue, I <br /> wanted to make sure that you saw Susie's memo (attached). Clearly, the authors (Susie, et al) see my action to bring <br /> the subject of Coburg's wastewater needs to the SEL as pushing the limit...(this matter is not "ripe for further SEL <br /> discussion at this time..." "requested that no other action be taken on this matter at this time.") <br /> I know that the memo will have a very familiar and unhappy tone for the Coburg folks, and I'm sure there is frustration <br /> there. Understand, I am not Coburg's agent. I am responding to a direct request from Faye Stewart and felt that a <br /> candid discussion by the SEL might be an appropriate step--perhaps leading to a meeting of the "owners" of the <br /> regional system, but perhaps not. I understand that you won't be there on Friday and it appears that Mike may be <br /> absent as well. However, Mike notes that "other technical folks" will be there.... I'm guessing that this will not be the <br /> kind of exposition of the subject that I had hoped. But that's the way it goes... Congratulations on your daughter's <br /> graduation. A big day! george <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: KELLY Michael ~mailto:mkellyCa~ci.springfield.or.usl <br /> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:55 PM <br /> To: KLOEPPEL George W; TAYLOR Dennis M <br /> Cc: PAPPAS Cynthia; SMITH Susan; BROWN Dan <br /> Subject: FW: Response to Coburg issue for SEL discussion <br /> George: Please see the note from Susie et al below. Lets indeed schedule this matter for SEL this Friday. I likely will <br /> be out of town but Cynythia is up to speed and Susie will be there with other technical folks. <br /> The only thing I would change about Susie's memo is in the second line under Issue. I think the real decision for the <br /> 1 <br /> <br />