Coburg Connection - Laserfiche WebLink

New Search

1vlessage _ wo~~,~rces Page 1 of 3 COREY Kurt q From; SMITH Susan Sent: Tuesda " " Y, November 15, To: 2005 7:06 PM - RUFFIER peter J; COREY Kurt A Cc: Subject: BROWN Dan' KELLY Mike RE: Coburg's MW importance: MC Connection High Kurt and Peter, After Peter and I reviewed Dennis and Mike a `path fonyard" sent b and have the this evenin y one of the m decide whether to t g' ~t seems that we ma appropriate. m on behalf of both. rY to formulate the y want to fo Council ? think that ? understand that Dennis was thinki rward this information to meetin Mike will want to combined info into a g is on Monday ni ht make a more timely res ng that a letter would getter or an e Here's g ~ and he'll want to ponse (probabl most mail - a shot at the S get a response to him Y through email), because our from the pringfield side of the res prior to the Eugene side. ponse to D meeting. on Schuessler's inqui,-y. In blue below i The Springfield Ci extension of Council has indicated- its s Peter's info our Council until the ater services to Cobur , wilhn gness to proceed with ste been that the public decision- g Actual thum ps tha y ex ect makin bs up/thu t could ° a connection fee p Cobur 9 processes mbs down decisions ould not bead to that achievestfu lucosthrecovery, W have run their course. should take less u?1'costs of the up-front work that would iro made by would like to time and co _ , guidance to staff thus far has be as res me at a lower c"b' a recognize that Cobur ' ccur and that the time and cost less p°nsive and ex st, and that the ultimate connect on1ew,s that the y would pay critical co than our estimates peditioUs in pr°cessin costs should be oWe WOWe resourcesnCern to Cobur , ~ we would all be g this matter as possible, to be g and we feel we owe it to Well-served. and if the process takes less experience assigned to this Cobur , However, we understand that timin and a we have pjoject, tot g and our elected officials who ry to paint a realistic picture of w genc had with inter'urisdictional decision g is a y costs to compete the makin will authorize the Re precursor work g of this nature at lies ahead. Based on si garding your re and approval processes rna' we estimate that the gnificant additional coordination t to isolate the work needed to evaluat y even be time frames that were among Eugene and S °n the optimistic side. the Eu provided to the joint elected grin field. e Coburg's re gene Council re °fficials does limit theescotimeated timef acne this is an issue that potential ' quested that a broader and costs for " may require factored ,nto the tions' requests. decision p of work to up front current estimateshe resources model be develo a Coburg-onl work and time needed to develod that could be Y analysis. However, p such applied to other a decision model have not been From; RUFFIER peter ] Sent: [mailto Peter.]. Tuesday, November 15 RUFFIER Sub eMITH Susan• Kurtq 05 5:48 pM ci.eugene.or.us] COREY 1 RE: Coburg's MWMC Connection Importance: High for Here's VMC a shot at Eugene's side of the response to D ;your On October 26 the Eu on Schuessler's ' i of the of a model that could be us dl o a otulcil inquiry' Please edit ruthlessly: sh to extension of re ~ on a 5 to 3 vote, authorized Ci n to be ist the Council in decidin ty staff to ~ being set a definitive gional wastewater service fro work on develo deadline for this work to m the MW g the question of w pment effort that can be MC to the Ci Nether to endorse put into the be brought back to the °f Coburg. The Co no separate fundin ~'Ork by staff is bein m for consideration ~cjl did not 'li' question of g has been allocated to su g determined b ~ and the level of whether the Eugene Co pport the y COrnpeting priorities and the fa uncil will undertalcing• It is therefore 11/16/2005 make a decision on the issue hard to ct that prior to the answer the - United Front trip