New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
CIP
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
CIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2010 9:57:02 AM
Creation date
8/6/2008 9:47:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Engineering
PWA_Project_Area
Road Repair
PW_Subject
CIP
Document_Date
9/26/2008
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Transportation CIP Policy Issues <br /> 1. As part of a TMA with a population greater than 200,000, Eugene may no longer <br /> eligible for the STP fund exchange program. Options include: <br /> a. Develop a fund exchange program with Lane County based upon the State model. <br /> STP funds would be matched by $75k of TSMF funds. Traffic calming, street <br /> trees, residential streetlights, and sidewalk access ramps would be fully funded. <br /> Remaining STP funds would be matched by transportation SDCs and used for <br /> bikeways. <br /> b. Use STP funds with a transportation SDC match to fund bikeway projects and use <br /> the $75k STP match identified as part of the TSMF to partially fund traffic <br /> calming, street trees, residential street lights, and sidewalk access ramps. This is <br /> the recommended policy and reflected in the draft CIP. <br /> 2. Bikeway projects in the CIP <br /> a. Show specific projects for the first two years and a general category - "Priority <br /> Bikeway Projects" for the remaining years. This is the recommended policy and <br /> reflected in the draft CIP. <br /> b. Show specific projects for each year of the CIP. <br /> c. Show a general category - "Priority Bikeway Projects" for each year of the CIl'. <br /> 3. Under the City's new assessment policies there are an estimated $~"million in <br /> delayed. assessments for the arterial and collector transportation improvements in the <br /> CIl'. Shortly after the adoption of the new assessment policies $300,000 in "seed <br /> money" was set aside from the Bond Reserve Fund to pay for delayed assessments <br /> until such time that the property with the delayed assessment development and the <br /> delay assessment was paid. The "seed money" has been committed to assessment <br /> projects completed or budgeted in the FY 03 budget. The alternatives for financing <br /> <br /> . the delayed assessments anticipated for the projects in the CIP include: <br /> a. Use.transportation SDCs. This option will further constrain the transportation <br /> CIl'. This is the policy reflected in the draft CIP. <br /> ?6~ <br /> b. Set aside an additional $~million of the $4 million Bond Reserve Fund. This is <br /> . the recommended policy. <br /> Transportation CII' Assumptions <br /> 1. TSMF funds will be allocated to the following general categories per the direction of <br /> the Budget Committee: <br /> a. Street and Alley Preservation $8,500,000 <br /> b. Bicycle System Preservation and Maintenance $405,000 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.