New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Amazon Headwaters (2)
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Amazon Headwaters (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 3:10:46 PM
Creation date
8/27/2015 3:09:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
Fiscal_Year
2016
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. .. <br /> The bottom line as of today is that we should hold off using <br /> Tucker until we see where the private effort goes toward <br /> acquiring the parcel. I don't see LCC disposing of the land <br /> immediately since I believe the value is much lower than the <br /> almost $200,000 assessed valuation. <br /> My own feeling is that if Cummins wants to push ahead using <br /> Tucker to ferret out the title answers that we chip in some <br /> token amount, say $250.00, if that would allow us to use <br /> whatever information he turns up for our benefit, should we <br /> have to fall back to a plan that involves a land exchange. <br /> If you think we can access that information without paying for <br /> it, then I'd withdraw my suggestion. In an case, don't offer <br /> any participation until Johnny gets back next week and has a <br /> chance to support or veto this idea. <br /> --John <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.