New Search
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: FERGUSON Joe M <br /> To: ETTER John F; MEDLIN Johnny R; Haniuk, Walt (RIS1) <br /> Cc: HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: RE: Title questions along Bridle Trail <br /> Date: Monday, November 28, 1994 9:51 AM <br /> I think someone needs to contact the Cummins and tell them what we're proposing to do (or not do) - <br /> they've been pushing the City for an answer for a couple of years now. My reading of the original <br /> easement is that a driveway across the easement would be permissible. Best way to accomplish this might <br /> be a revocable permit; it would be up to them to verify that they have access to the Bridle Trail via Vivian <br /> Drive. I don't see that County would have any involvement in such a permit. jf <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: ETTER John F; FERGUSON Joe M; Haniuk, Walt (RIS1) <br /> Cc: HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: RE: Title questions along Bridle Trail <br /> Date: Monday, November 28, 1994 7:59AM <br /> Hi folks, <br /> I concur with what John is suggesting below. Since there <br /> seems to be little risk of development activity at this point <br /> in time waiting to see how the various private interests in <br /> the neighborhood work the issue seems a good course of action <br /> for us. <br /> Thanks Johnny <br /> From: ETTER John F <br /> To: FERGUSON Joe M; Haniuk, Walt (RIS1) <br /> Cc: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Subject: Title questions along Bridle Trail <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 1994 1 :50PM <br /> I caught Johnny in the hall and briefed him on our meeting, <br /> and projected higher cost on the work to be done. He <br /> suggested that we didn't have anything to lose immediately by <br /> waiting to see what the outcome of the private fund raising <br /> effort might be. An optomistic scenario might go as follows: <br /> 1. Frank Anderson deeds his half, which include the trail <br /> easement, to LCC by 12/31/94. <br /> 2. LCC has the burden of marketing it to get whatever they <br /> can out of it. It is during this period that it's true market <br /> value will be determined. This could take a number of months. <br /> 3. In a year or two, if it turns out to be as little as one <br /> developer said (nothing in terms of residential development) <br /> then the private fund raisers might acquire it for a pitance. <br /> If the whole former Anderson parcel is acquired and turned <br /> over to the City as open space for park purposes, then we <br /> wouldn't need to become involved in relocating the easement. <br /> The easement could remain as is forever; we put the trail(s) <br /> wherever seems best on the larger parcel. <br /> 4. The Cummins piece is not crucial to creating the Amazon - <br /> Ridgeline connection if things develop as described above. It <br /> becomes more crucial to Cummins, therefore, to pursue the <br /> chain of title question. He is the one who could benefit <br /> immediately from the work that Tucker could do. <br /> Page 1 <br />