New Search
Draft Draft Draft <br /> open waterways/maintenance/engineering subgroup. Mr. Medlin replied that the approach to be <br /> taken would be the decision of the Management Team, which could elect to assemble a group <br /> from several divisions to conduct the review. <br /> Mr. Corey summarized the Policy Team's expectation that the Management Team recommend <br /> how to develop the Open Waterways Maintenance Plan and an estimate of resource needs if the <br /> plan is adopted. <br /> Mr. Medlin suggested the Management Team identify who should be involved in the West Nile <br /> Virus Plan. Mr. Corey suggested that a work session with the City Council be held to inform <br /> them that Lane County would take the lead in a regional response. <br /> Mr. Medlin stated that the plan should include a communication component for public education <br /> and proactive and reactive functions. Mr. Corey said that good models existed in comparable <br /> communities that had already dealt with the problem. <br /> Ms. Walch briefly reviewed each of the remaining items on the draft SWMT Work Plan, and <br /> noted the order of priority. Mr. Medlin asked for clarification on the first item, Underground <br /> Injection Control Program lead. Ms Walch replied that this was placed at the head of the list <br /> because it was time-sensitive and only required a decision that could be made quickly. She said <br /> items at the end of the list, such as the annual report, had longer time lines or were there as a <br /> placeholder for an upcoming project that might involve the Management Team. She cited the <br /> stormwater program review as an example of the latter. <br /> The group discussed the stormwater program review and concluded that while the process and <br /> time lines were not yet established, it would be a top priority for both the Policy Team and the <br /> Management Team, once the matter was referred to a budget subcommittee. The group agreed <br /> that the item would remain on the SWMT Work Plan as a"floater" until more details on the <br /> approach and time line were available. The group also agreed that once the stormwater program <br /> review commenced, it would have top priority, even at the expense of progress on other work <br /> plan items. <br /> Storm water Policy Team Febikary 11,2003 Page 6 <br />