New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Vegetation (2)
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Miscellaneous
>
Vegetation (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 10:51:32 AM
Creation date
10/17/2014 10:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin Veg Folder
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />Vegetation Management Program <br />Cost Analysis <br />March 30, 1990 <br />by <br />Jack Long <br />Maintenance Planning Section <br />The primary aim of this analysis is to examine, separate, and document the <br />costs associated with the Vegetation Management Program's various management <br />categories and to calculate an average City incurred cost for each of the <br />various types of vegetation abatements enforced through this program. These <br />per abatement costs will then serve as the starting point for restructuring <br />the vegetation program's owner billing schedules. Such billing schedule <br />restructuring has been called for by an independent hearings official hired by <br />the City with concurrence from the City Attorney's Office. <br />The secondary aim of this analysis is to calculate the average City incurred <br />cost for each nuisance complaint or property that was inspected but not abated <br />by the City. Since these costs are not currently being recovered through <br />property owner billings, they will only serve to illustrate the expense the <br />Vegetation Management Program must absorb for each enforcement operation <br />"success ". By "success" we mean those vegetation nuisance enforcements that <br />are ultimately resolved by the property owners themselves. <br />The first step in this analysis calculates the average percentage of annual <br />time the Vegetation Manager devotes to the operation and administration of the <br />Vegetation Management Program. To this is added the time spent by the <br />temporary summer aide. The resultant figure is total annual personal services <br />time spent on this program. <br />The next step breaks this total personal services time down between the 3 <br />different management categories. This is accomplished by the use of an <br />activity time matrix (Table I) that documents the average times involved in <br />the performance of minor activities that, when taken together, make up the <br />major enforcement operation functions of the program. The calculated totals <br />of these activities, herein called function times, are then multiplied by the <br />number of such enforcement functions performed during the 1989 calendar year. <br />The resultant figures then give us the total time spent on each of the various <br />functions for the entire year (Table II). Since these function times have <br />been segregated into their respective management categories, the amount of <br />annual operations time spent in each management category is easily derived by <br />adding the annual function times within each category. Dividing this by the <br />total of all the function times, we get the percentages of total program <br />operations spent in each management category. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.