The Vegetation Manager and the temporary summer aide have different pay and <br />benefit rates, therefore, the next step of this analysis calculates the <br />varying percentages of each of these positions' time that was spent during <br />calendar year 1989 in the enforcement functions and administration of each <br />management category. <br />By subtracting the total time of all enforcement operation functions from the <br />total annual time devoted to the program, we get the amount of program time <br />spent on administrative duties. When this total amount of administration time <br />is prorated by the calculated percentages of operations time per management <br />category we can calculate the amount of time and resultant program percentage <br />of administration time spent in each category (Table III). <br />With the documentation of position time and administration time per management <br />category, we now have all the information necessary for the actual assignment <br />of costs between the various management categories. <br />At this point the administration costs' for both personal services and <br />materials are calculated for each category (Table IV). Following this, the <br />average operations cost per abatement for each management category is calcu- <br />lated based on an itemization, by category, of the program's operating <br />expenses for calendar year 1989 (Table V). Lastly, the activity costs are <br />calculated for a typical City performed abatement in each management category <br />(Tables VI, VII, & VIII). By multiplying these typical abatement costs by the <br />number of such abatements and subtracting this from the total operations <br />activity costs we calculate the costs involved in program operations not <br />requiring City abatement. Both the calculated administration costs and the <br />nonabatement costs in each category are divided by the number of enforcement <br />functions per category to give us a per function cost for each. <br />All of these costs are then multiplied by the Maintenance Division's indirect <br />overhead rate of 32.8 %. The overhead adjusted administration cost per <br />enforcement function and the overhead adjusted typical abatement cost in each <br />category are added to give us a total cost for City performed abatements in <br />each category. Likewise, the overhead adjusted activity cost for each <br />enforcement or inspection that did not require City abatement is added to the <br />overhead adjusted administration per enforcement function in each category to <br />give us the total cost for each such nonabated enforcement function. <br />The table on the following page (Table X from the main document) summarizes <br />these different costs after the overhead adjusted administration charge per <br />enforcement function has been added. It is these final costs that should be <br />considered as the total Maintenance Division amount to be added to the <br />contractor's charges in the restructuring of a new owner billing schedule. <br />As used herein, administration costs shall refer only to expenses <br />associated with activities or materials used by the Vegetation Manager during <br />the course of the year. They do not include costs associated with the <br />Vegetation Manager's supervision or other organizational administrative or <br />overhead costs. These other organizational costs are included as part of the <br />Maintenance Division's 32.8 % indirect overhead rate. <br />