New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Vegetation (2)
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Miscellaneous
>
Vegetation (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 10:51:32 AM
Creation date
10/17/2014 10:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin Veg Folder
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VTC�d`f? G�h <br />Public Works <br />Maintenance <br />May 4 , 1-990 1820 Roosevelt Boulevard <br />Eugene, Oregon 97402 <br />(503) 687 -5220 <br />TO: Mike Gleason, City Manager <br />FROM: J.R. Medlin, Maintenance Support Manager <br />SUBJECT: VEGETATION ABATEMENT RATES <br />Sections 6.090 and 6.523 of the Municipal Code for the City of Eugene provides <br />for the City to be reimbursed, through charges to the property owner, for <br />expenses incurred in the city abatement of obnoxious vegetation or nuisance <br />vegetation as defined in either Section 6.101 or 6.515 of the code. <br />Past practice has been to charge the property owner $75.00 for the first hour <br />the city's vegetation contractor spent upon the abatement and $40.00 for each <br />additional hour. These rates were used on both the developed and the unde- <br />veloped parcel abatements. It was the intent for these charges to recover <br />both the city's payment to the contractor as well as the city's internal costs <br />for the abatement. Late last year an appeal brought before the City's <br />Hearings Official resulted in this methodology being declared unsatisfactory <br />for abatement billings. <br />A rates study has since been conducted with review and subsequent approval by <br />the City Attorneys Office. This study showed we are not recovering our costs <br />for vegetation abatement activities and that in some situations the current <br />charge structure is unrealistic and the expenses incurred were dispropor- <br />tionate between developed and undeveloped parcel abatements. Therefore, I am <br />proposing that we change the charge format and adjust the charges to more <br />accurately recover our costs. This change in structure will allow separate <br />rates for developed and undeveloped parcels based on the following formula: <br />Public Works Maintenance Abatement Expense <br />+ Actual Billing by Abatement Contractor <br />+ Finance Division Accounts Receivable Expense <br />TOTAL CHARGE TO PROPERTY OWNER <br />The new rates for abatements as shown by the rates study are proposed to be: <br />Parcel <br />PW Maint. <br />Finance <br />City <br />TOTAL BILLING TO THE <br />Type <br />Ex�Denses <br />Expenses <br />Costs <br />PROPERTY OWNER <br />Developed <br />$ 106.31 + <br />$ 26.20 = <br />$ 132.51 <br />$ 132.51 + Contractor's Cost <br />Undeveloped <br />$ 90.60 + <br />$ 26.20 = <br />$ 116.80 <br />$ 116.80 + Contractor's Cost <br />Please sign upon the space provided below and return prior to May 15, 1990 if <br />you wish to implement rate adjustment. <br />el A , 1 �� <br />i <br />e aSVn, City Manimer Date <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.