New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Vegetation (2)
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Miscellaneous
>
Vegetation (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 10:51:32 AM
Creation date
10/17/2014 10:47:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin Veg Folder
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Date: 09/16/92 <br />From: Johnny Medlin CEWMJRM - RIS1 <br />To: Bob Hammitt CEWMJRH - RIS1 <br />Subject: Walnut grove vegetation issue <br />Reference: Note from Steve Stone (CEWMSBS - RIS1) attached below <br />Bob, below is the time line of events culminating in the Register Guard <br />Don Bishop article about mowing Walnut Grove. <br />Johnny <br />-------------------------- - - - - -- ATTACHED NOTE -------------------------- - - - - -- <br />Date: 09/16/92 <br />From: Steve Stone CEWMSBS - RIS1 <br />To: Johnny Medlin CEWMJRM - RIS1 <br />Subject: Walnut grove vegetation issue <br />Johnny, I have looked back through my phone messages and notes to research the <br />timetable of events related to this issue. <br />7/14/92- I recieved a vegetation complaint from a Becky Holm regarding the city <br />owned lot that abutts her property. This is the old walnut orchard <br />located between Northwest Expressway and N. Park Ave. <br />7/15/92- I called Richie Weinman in planning and developement and told him of <br />the complaint. He said he would take care of it. <br />7/24/92- Mrs. Holm called again, I told her that we were working on it and it <br />would be mowed as soon as possible. <br />7/29/92- Mrs. Holm called again, same response as above. After I talked to Mrs. <br />Holm I called Richie and asked if he was close to having the problem <br />taken care of. He said he was working on it and would get it done as <br />soon as he could. <br />8/17/92- Mrs. Holm called again to complain that nothing had been done yet. I <br />called Richie to see if there was a problem and at that point he asked <br />me to take care of it. <br />8/21/92- I wrote the work order for the contractor to mow the property <br />8/26/92- On or about this date the contractor's mower broke down and was out of <br />service for 1 week. <br />9/08/92- The lot was mowed. <br />I would also like to add that although the tone of the Register Gaard article <br />leaned toward separation of city departments that was not my intent. When Mr. <br />Bishoff called I attemped to infer that we as an organization were working on <br />the problem, but I chose not to answer for planning and developement and sug- <br />gested that Mr. Bishoff call down there for more clarification. Following the <br />article Fred and I discussed the issue and talked about possible alternatives <br />that I could have used to more clearly state the city's position in cases such <br />as this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.