New Search
• <br /> Further development of Cal Young athletic fields would further have negative impacts on <br /> the value of the private residential property we own and pay city taxes on. I resent the <br /> format of this "workshop ". The wording and mechanism of feedback is obviously slanted <br /> towards the positive aspects of such a "sports complex" proposal. In spite of your <br /> dismissal to the contrary, your presentation tonight smacks of a "done deal" to spend the <br /> money where you feel we (the taxpayers) would eventually see the merits of your <br /> decisions. <br /> • The Gilham Elementary property is larger, and might very well suit the purpose of the <br /> sports complex design. Certainly, there is more room for parking at that site, compared <br /> to the Cal Young site. The busy intersection of Gilham and Crescent could be intensified <br /> if you proceed to develop the Cal Young site, conversely, the Gilham site is remote from <br /> the busy intersection, yet is served well by Gilham St. and from the West by Delta <br /> Highway. <br /> Cal Young Youth Sports Park <br /> Page 7 <br /> Introductory Meeting <br />