process by Rowell Brokaw Architects. He had been very encouraged at the initial meeting, but when the <br />Community Advisory Team (CAT) was formed, he had not been as encouraged. He felt it was not ade- <br />quately weighted toward environmental and open space concerns. He had been vocal about it as an indi- <br />vidual, but the CPC as a whole had not taken a position on the issue. <br />Mr. Ruiz explained that EWEB had approved their plan, and now it would move into a City process, which <br />would be a 12 -month land use analysis. He said that there would be a lot more opportunity to weigh in. <br />He thought there needed to be more discussion about how the property integrated in the master plan with <br />the rest of the river corridor all the way to Walnut Station, particularly in the part of the research park that <br />was north of the railroad tracks. How these areas were a signature part of Eugene was important to him. <br />He hoped to address these issues sooner rather than later. <br />Ms. Behm asked how Mr. Ruiz saw his role as the City Manager: did he see himself as neutral or as an <br />advocate? <br />Mr. Ruiz noted that for a vast majority of issues, he brought a City Manager's recommendation to the City <br />Council. <br />Ms. Behm asked where these recommendations came from. <br />Mr. Ruiz stated that they came from a variety of places, depending on the issue – sometimes from staff. <br />He stated that he tried to listen to community members, and tried to apply his and his staff's best profes- <br />sional judgment. He did not think of himself as an advocate in the sense of having strong opinions. He <br />did not think that was his role. He thought his role was to try to understand various aspects of an issue <br />from a lot of different viewpoints, and apply his best professional judgment. Sometimes, his role was find- <br />ing common ground between divergent viewpoints on an issue. <br />Ms. Behm asked Mr. Ruiz if he had been on a tour of the WNA. <br />Mr. Ruiz said that he had, on bicycle. He stated that he was always open to learning new things from any <br />constituency. <br />Mr. Holloter noted that the University of Oregon (UO) was advocating for a bridge over the river to Aut- <br />zen Stadium. <br />Mr. Ruiz said that the UO was interested in improving that access. He had not been in direct conversations <br />with them. <br />Mr. Holloter noted that he had been involved in the same issue about ten years before, when the Lane <br />Transit District had studied converting the Autzen ped/bike bridge for motorized bus use. The CPC had <br />pointed out that the plan for the "A called for no motorized vehicles traveling across the Willamette <br />River through Alton Baker Park. Mayor Torrey had told him that the motorized vehicle ban might not be <br />legally enforceable.. <br />Mr. Ruiz did not know the legal parameters, but he was supportive of the work that the CPC did, and the <br />work staff did to preserve open space. He explained that Sarah Medary, the Assistant City Manager, was <br />the City Manager's Office liaison with the UO, and she would be open to meeting with them. <br />Mr. Sonnichsen stated that the City Council would be able to amend the East Alton Baker Park plan at any <br />time. He made clear that the CPC was concerned about the research park development north of the rail- <br />MINUTES — Citizen Planning Committee for the July 15, 2010 Page 4 <br />Whilamut Natural Area <br />