New Search
Compaction /destroying of dirt, banks, plants <br />Signage needed <br />Trash deposited in the park <br />Water pollution into the canoe canal from people using it for a bathroom <br />MANAGEMENT <br />Long term TDM (Transportation Demand Management plan) must include removal <br />of Parking Lot #8. Compute and include cost of reversion EABP parking lot #8 <br />to its natural state. <br />Is the present IGA re- negotiable as part of this process? The $300 is well <br />below market value for the parking spaces and does not mitigate the resulting <br />loss of park land or the impact on Parking Lot #8 land. <br />The CPC needs to be involved th the yearly review, which is #10 in proposed TDM. <br />How is the University going to address concerns for years to come? What is the <br />process, and what is the back -up if the process is not working? <br />PARAMETERS <br />The path between Autzen bridge and the stadium cannot be widened. It can be <br />resurfaced to make it level. <br />The plan calls for the parking lot to be reassessed in 2007. If UO is not planning <br />to relinquish the use of the parking lot as part of the current TDM plan, then <br />we need a status report on how far they are on their commitment to find <br />alternative parking during 1996 -2007. We want a status report on what they <br />are doing to meet that commitment. <br />The CPC and other user groups want to return the lot to a park in 2007. It <br />was never intended to be used as a parking lot by Lane County voters. <br />Native trees need to be planted in the parking lot - trees that grow tall, to <br />shield the park from unsightly impact of such a tall stadium. The sooner we <br />plant the trees, the better. For instance, Ponderosa Pines, Douglas Fir, <br />Incense Cedar. <br />There are solutions /technology available to manage the stadium lighting to be <br />low impact for the park that needs to be instituted. UO may even save money <br />by these methods. <br />2 <br />