New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Parks, U of O, TDM
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
Parks, U of O, TDM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2014 3:39:55 PM
Creation date
8/20/2014 3:39:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Current bicycle parking requirements of the Eugene code are not responsive to the particular <br />bicycle use patterns experienced or expected at Autzen Stadium on major event days or non- <br />event days. The current long -term bike parking requirements are meant to accommodate <br />employees and others who "can be expected to leave their bicycle parked for more than two <br />hours." (EC 9.585 General Bicycle Parking Requirements) Long -term bike parking required <br />by the code was not intended to serve event patrons and spectators, even though game and <br />event patrons are likely to be there for more than 2 hours. Rather, long -term parking was <br />intended to serve University employees who work at the facility, and athletes who practice at <br />the facility. Normally, fewer than 300 people are on the site at any given time. This includes <br />the 135 employees who work at the complex and as many as 160 athletes who may be using the <br />facilities at one time. Application of the existing code requirements would result in the <br />construction of 672 long -term bike parking spaces, a number far in excess of those needed to <br />accommodate normal long -term parking needs. <br />Similarly, the current code requirements for short-term bicycle parking are not suited to the <br />particular demands generated by the stadium expansion proposal. Current short-term parking <br />requirements are meant to accommodate "visitors, customers, messengers, and others expected <br />to depart within 2 hours ". When applied to the expansion proposal, short-term bike parking <br />should serve the needs of event patrons and spectators (visitors). Application of the current <br />short-term requirements would result in the construction of almost 3,000 bicycle parking <br />spaces and those facilities would need to be §.� , _ . w stadium and <br />other buildings. Since the need for event parking is limited (6 to 8 times per year, including <br />potential non -game events), that need may best be met by erecting temporary bike parking <br />shelters that can be put up before the event and taken down after the event.. Furthermore, the <br />facility placement standard in the existing code precludes the potential for separating bicycle <br />traffic from pedestrian traffic. The proposed amendment would allow short-term bike parking <br />to be placed in areas that will allow bicycles to be intercepted before they enter heavy <br />pedestrian traffic. <br />The proposed amendment to section 9.585 of the code would establish a long -term bike <br />parking requirement of 300 spaces; those facilities would be located in areas adjacent to <br />buildings. The amendment would establish a short-term bike parking requirement of 800 <br />spaces which would be provided in temporary, secured, and attended shelters. This strategy <br />"'A V "' of long - term spaces, and double the number of short spaces <br />currently provided and would allow expansion of the short-term bike parking as demand <br />dictates. The number of short-term spaces for each year could be adjusted based on an <br />evaluation of bicycles used at the previous year's events. <br />Transportation Demand Management (TDMI Plan <br />The University submitted a draft TDM plan to the city in support of its request that the Council <br />initiate the code amendment. Parts of the TDM plan are incomplete; others are somewhat <br />sketchy. Because it is incomplete, the draft TDM plan is not included as an attachment to this <br />staff report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.