New Search
Youth Sports Parks <br /> Response to 43 proposal <br /> January 25, 2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> of public funds. Examples are the coordinated mowing program and <br /> irrigation maintenance, which is area where the City has spe expertise. <br /> Undoing the cooperative maintenance . ffi- en ' ` . back to <br /> segregated maintenance responsibiliti ould be d costly. <br /> would shift workloads to areas wher x ere is i qua f� <br /> example, 4J doesn't have as Iargean irr *anon mirenanc- =pct .s <br /> the City) and would result in an ine of resources. <br /> ► PWM staff feels that the current mai s. !'141,5 `M - ment is working well <br /> for both entities. <br /> 3. The 43 proposal would make the C ® - ®'- for alit s arising from the <br /> skate parks, including claims all g des a� o . - <br /> ► The City and 43 joint) ;articip. �d in th •n development and 43 <br /> administered the d4 con <br /> ► 4J is currently s ing - Cal Yo Skate Park. <br /> 4. Th a was wn ® 4J staff and David Piercy. The current 43 <br /> "' . n ge t � ous agreement regarding liability issues <br /> a that t I" re- written. <br /> t props .° of consistent with previous discussions, <br /> °_ - and .. reements. <br /> 5. °' ere have bee = ms arising from the use of these facilities, and no reason <br /> to expect that , r see a lot of claims, so there is no reason to adopt a <br /> proposal whic , ould require such a major change in our operations. <br /> Proposal - Plan B <br /> City staff came up with a proposal which would meet the goal of sharing responsibility <br /> for the risks and liabilities arising from the Youth Sports Parks. The City would assume <br /> responsibility for claims related to the physical condition of the "park features" except <br /> as outlined below. Ask Glenn Klein re: letter of understanding or IGA amendment? <br />