New Search
Youth Sports Parks <br /> Response to 43 proposal <br /> January 25, 2001 <br /> Page 3 <br /> General Responsibility for Claims: <br /> • arising from or related to maintenance activities wo Al be <br /> responsibility of the maintaining party. <br /> • arising from or related to supervision w t•e t silty of the <br /> supervising party. <br /> • arising from or related to scheduling progra g <br /> responsibility of the scheduling or pr mmparty. <br /> • arising from or related to the design ;cilities would be 'int <br /> responsibility of both parties; <br /> ► arising from or related to the conditi. • =` ses would be shared <br /> • as follows: 43 is responsible for the`thletic <br /> COE is responsible fo rk feat ned above. <br /> Benefits of City Alternative - Plan B <br /> • COE and 43 would sh risks ociate•� outh Sports Parks <br /> • No need to chang: -xisti e!'° ainten A ce agreements; <br /> • No need to rewr' ° A; ( irirk with -nn Klein) <br /> • Dispute reso uti in the <br /> ► - , ionality of maintenance; <br /> The publi �, <.' r serv- � ty <br /> ,_ spon -ar - Ri , • I S to responsible party; <br /> • 10 . Q a ,-sses key 43 concern regarding claims associated with <br /> - .04.141,1? of t' a . Under current agreement condition of <br /> • all 4 11,iihi,v as owner. <br /> Next S - <br /> 1. x , 0, Jeff Lanks `• F ief Jim Johnson, Jim Croteau on 4J proposal and alternate <br /> 9 <br /> Rsk, Bill Hirschy • Jeff Lankston have meeting to review. <br /> reach - m -ment, must go to Youth Sports Park Policy team for buy off. <br /> Onti Bill Hirsch, George Russell, Jeff Lankston) <br />