New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Petersen Barn, Ross House
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Petersen Barn, Ross House
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 10:51:43 AM
Creation date
8/6/2014 10:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Petersen Barn
Document_Number
Petersen Barn Community Center
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: EVELETH Doug A <br /> Cc: ETTER John F; MORGAN Dick A; HAMMITT Bob; Patrick, Tim (RIS1) <br /> Subject: Lighting at Peterson Park <br /> Date: Monday, February 06, 1995 8:30AM <br /> Hi Doug, <br /> I recently reviewed a memo from Tim Patrick to you and Dick Morgan regarding lighting at Peterson Park and <br /> while I'm cautiously optimistic I wanted to flag a couple of issues for you. <br /> First, I believe you will need more input from the immediate neighbors than is supplied by working with the <br /> Neighborhood group. I say this from a recent experience of our starting to do a picnic table placement project at <br /> the request of ABC and then having the project stopped by the immediate neighbors who didn't want the tables <br /> next to their properties. I think lighting has the potential of being even more controversial. At the very least 1 <br /> would think individual notification of the immediate neighbors and allowing a period of time for their comment <br /> would be required. I'm not sure who would need to do this public process but it is not in Park Planning's current <br /> very full work plan. I would want to look very closely at current project priorities prior to John's taking on another <br /> project right now. <br /> Second, I suspect that John Etter's recent experience with the Amazon jogging path lighting project may of <br /> changed his feelings a little about volunteers taking on a large volunteer project. There were problems with not <br /> sufficient review of the design, lack of volunteer supervision and lack of knowledge of construction technique. <br /> We ended up having to do extensive inspection that wasn't anticipated. I'm not sure who would take staff lead <br /> on design, review, and construction coordination but it very likely would be more time consuming for staff than <br /> one would think.. <br /> I don't want to throw cold water on the idea and enthusiasm, but neither do I once again want us to get into the <br /> middle of a project without having the details worked out ahead of time. <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.