New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Towery Review
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
Towery Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2014 1:51:52 PM
Creation date
7/15/2014 1:51:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Possible strategies for good decision model: <br /> 1. Have an individual reponsible for getting decisions through processes. <br /> 2. Prioritize issues relating to the decision or effort. <br /> 3. Recognise complexity that exists. Decisions will affect many activities and processes. <br /> 4. Identify clear goals for projects so they can be considered during decision process. <br /> 5. Develop clear roles and responsibilities and identify transition steps and potential issues. <br /> 6. Identify key people involved in the decision process or project. <br /> 7. Follow process for decisions or projects. <br /> 8. Provide and build in feedback methods for people involved in decision - making and related <br /> projects or processes. <br /> 9. Develop skills for making decisions. <br /> Strategies for change should include the following process steps: <br /> 1. Define decision model and refine the decision model for functions and levels of authority. <br /> 2. Study examples to learn about successes and errors. <br /> 3. Test Model <br /> 4. Make sure that each functional area has a method to maintain and use the model. <br /> Issues: <br /> Decision model not identified — Competing interest, positions and missions add to the <br /> complexity of decision making for staff, which creates a need for staff to have people or groups <br /> with the appropriate level of authority to process decisions. Unfortunately, staff often does not <br /> have an adequate method to get decisions processed by individuals or groups with appropriate <br /> authority. Currently, the lack of a clear decision making process leads to delays, unclear <br /> communications or negotiations, increased conflict among the competing positions or stalled <br /> projects. When projects become stalled or delayed because of the poor decision process, the <br /> decisions might get made when all relevant parties are not present; personal convictions, and <br /> single interest become the impetus to move a decision, which often increases the number of <br /> problems. This confusion often results in staff feeling frustrated. This issue was identified as <br /> a driving force. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.