New Search
TABLE 40V <br /> I've dealt with this before and you can bet the thing is not what they are making it out to be. The boundaries need to be set <br /> and the developer needs to just do without. <br /> People do not have a say and never have. They need to leave the boundary right where it is and develop where they may. <br /> I just would hesitate that the City wifl pull something else on us. (probe) They will charge us a lot more on taxes. <br /> There is nothing in this that will prove to be true. Can't go for it. <br /> Once the boundary is moved, it's not going to stop for this developer. The city has lied about the ro sal and I won't approve <br /> any of this proposal. p pp <br /> I think this just proves that the City can be bought. <br /> £ This is not accurate information. The city govemment is untrustable and that is why I am taking my company and leaving the <br /> area next year. <br /> I just think it's totally stupid. We have a large park, and we have numerous schools with playgrounds and we're not that far <br /> from the sticks. I see it as a city land grab, actually. <br /> I'm opposed to the city encroaching in this area and I feel that they are telling people what to do all the time. <br /> I know where they want to put it, and it is on prime agricultural land. I think the govemment has stuck its nose too deep into <br /> the Santa Clara area already. <br /> I would support it if I know we would get a park and not just some open space and nothing there. I would also disapprove of <br /> developing the south hills and nothing on this end. <br /> I feel they have so much property and parks that they don't maintain. They keep acquiring land and don't do anything with it. It <br /> seems like the city council does what it wants. <br /> I don't trust the city of Eugene. From what I've read the deal isn't as good as it's presented. Just a park would be great. But not <br /> with the development. <br /> The city can't take care of the parks that we have. It sounds like the city council is going to shove it down our throat. The traffic <br /> out here is terrible. I have no idea what they will do with it. <br /> The deal itself stinks. The Streets cannot support that traffic. They waited to buy the property for more money. Residents <br /> COULD but wouldn't have input. If they get the land, they can't take care of it. <br /> Because of what they did to us with the sewers. I wouldn't support the city regarding anything. <br /> This is really about Eugene wanting to get hold of more land. <br /> We don't have the streets for more people. This is probably just another excuse for a land grab. <br /> If it has anything to do with the city of Eugene, I'm against it. We've been fighting annexation for years. <br /> City of Eugene is going to take over everything if we let them <br /> I don't trust anything the city of Eugene does when it comes to building and working with developers. I don't want to be <br /> annexed. <br /> If the city is pushing it, I'm against it. If they have all this money, why not spend it on the needs we have now? <br /> 1 don't trust the City of. Eugene and what they're going to do next. Against annexation - they are doing it piecemeal and this is <br /> just another example. <br /> 1 don't want the city gobbling up any more land. <br />