New Search
Sample Evaluation form for rating parcel based on City acceptance criteria: <br /> CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTING <br /> NON- DEVELOPABLE PARK LAND <br /> Up to /Pts /acre <br /> (unless noted) <br /> Can City maintain parcel to be donated? Y/N -2000 pts /FTE /acres <br /> (Note: Translated, this means that if we anticipate mowing, <br /> cleaning up transient camps, etc. to take one week per year <br /> that this would generate 20 negative points on a 2 acre <br /> piece as we are considering at Bramblewood. If we were <br /> looking at only one acre, the negative point value would be <br /> inversely proportional, or 40 negative points. This will <br /> help weed out problem sites. If we cannot answer "Yes" on <br /> this criterion, the parcel should not be accepted; no <br /> further analysis needed.) <br /> Any unacceptable liabilities that come with the parcel? Y/N <br /> (Note: No point values here. Acceptable liabilities are <br /> among the criteria below. If the answer is "Yes" on this <br /> criterion, the parcel should not be accepted; no further <br /> analysis needed.) <br /> Is parcel acceptance consistent with goals, policies and <br /> implementation strategies in adopted plans? Y/N /10 <br /> Is there a purpose served in accepting the parcel? <br /> Wetland preservation /management Y/N /10 <br /> Aesthetic or recreational value Y/N /10 <br /> Educational value Y/N /10 <br /> (Scoring on educational value is related to the proximity to <br /> schools. Any special attributes of the site that would <br /> cause people to travel some distance would be reflected in <br /> the criteria below related to endangered species and <br /> habitat.) <br /> Extra points for presense of endangered species /20 <br /> Extra points for prime animal habitat /15 <br /> lt,\/ )n11� Is there "critical mass" for a sustainable NR area with the size <br />