New Search
to be accepted? Or, does parcel significantly expand an existing <br /> NR system? Y/N /15 <br /> Is environmental assessment needed? Y/N / -2 <br /> Does parcel adversely affect adjacent parcels in terms of safety, <br /> or use conflicts? Y/N / -10 <br /> Mitigation bank value Y/N /10 <br /> + Points/ Maximum + point subtotal /100 <br /> - Points/ Maximum - point subtotal / -2012 <br /> Are there development costs that come with the parcel -- street <br /> ��) assessment, hazardous material or vegetation clean -up, drainage <br /> \ obligations, etc.? Y/N -1 pt /$1000 <br /> Market value of any portion that has value either as developable <br /> park land, or could be sold for development by others. <br /> 1 pt /$1,000 market value <br /> (Note: Again for Bramblewood, the 3 acres on the <br /> "neighborhood park" side of the street are assumed to be <br /> worth about $60,000, or have a point value of +60. This <br /> balances the negative point value of street costs estimated <br /> to be $60,000. If the street costs had been $80,000, we <br /> would have a -20 point total on the land side, which would <br /> V , have to be offset by at least a +21 subtotal for the <br /> 1 1-1 maintenance cost and natural resource rating criteria above <br /> to receive a overall favorable rating. Theoretically there <br /> 0 tu\ could be situations where we could have a negative rating on <br /> 01 ) � the maint. /NR criteria but have a more than offsetting <br /> positive balance on the land cost criteria that would <br /> � }� suggest we accept a piece.) <br /> I i \ <br /> , 0111 <br /> 1 Or <br /> f <br /> c V'u <br /> I . <br /> V \ .e, 0. a l t <br /> ), \\- - V(2, <br />