G', -r L 6_,....-c t l rare) 07{-‹s f /S 7 / <br /> Ms. Ehrman pointed out that at one time this was a controversial issue and <br /> said that it is nice to see those involved working cooperatively to find a '" <br /> solution. <br /> Mr. MacDonald offered his appreciation for the work that has been done on <br /> this project and suggested that the council hold a meeting at the Shelton - <br /> McMurphey house after it has been opened. <br /> Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. <br /> V. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF CODE AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE <br /> CONCERNING DOGS AT LARGE <br /> City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Doug Post, PARCS Department, <br /> gave the staff presentation. He said that the code amendment before the <br /> council would give the City Manager or his designee the authority to estab- <br /> lish a dog- off -leash program and the authority to designate appropriate City <br /> properties for this proposal. He noted that staff has received numerous <br /> requests from the public to establish a dog- off -leash area in the city. He <br /> noted that the cities of Corvallis and Salem have implemented similar pro- <br /> grams and have had relatively few problems, thus far. Under the proposal, <br /> the following three areas would be designated initially for dog- off -leash <br /> areas: 1) Wayne Morris Ranch, east pasture; 2) an undeveloped parcel by <br /> Gilhar+, School in the Willakenzie area; and 3) Candelight Park in the Bethel <br /> Area Mr. Post stated that the Joint Parks Committee has endorsed this con- <br /> cept, if all of the details can be worked out to successfully implement this <br /> program. "' <br /> Mr. MacDonald inquired about the definition of a "potentially dangerous dog." <br /> In response, Mr. Post said that he believes that potentially dangerous dogs <br /> are designated by the Animal Control Agency. Any dog who has been determined <br /> to be dangerous would be excluded from the dog- off -leash program. He added <br /> that the dog owner would have the primary responsibility for maintaining <br /> control of the animal at all times. <br /> Mr. Green asked if the dogs using the area would be required to have any <br /> visual identification that they were under voice control. Mr. Post said that <br /> there would be no visible identification to show that a dog was under voice <br /> control. The City would have rules and regulations for use of the areas at <br /> each site. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Post said that under the <br /> conditions of the ordinance, the City Manager has the authority to designate <br /> other sites as dog- off -leash areas, after the pilot program has been moni- <br /> tored and evaluated over a several month period. If the program is success- <br /> ful, the criteri used to identify hese sites could be used f additional <br /> ,, sites. However, - because of the stringent nature of the criteria there are <br /> ew. v p arcels eft that would be suitable for doq- off -leash a eas. If the <br /> program is successful, there may be some County parcels that might fit the <br /> criteria for dog- off -leash area. <br /> MINUTES -- Eugene City Council August 5, 1991 Page 4 <br /> 5 -4r,r 7l ,_ ]j_C ..." -/ K C ' rt / Cr " - / <br /> J c <br /> Se t 7-'} r-.. "So -ti 2.,s / 9 S / <br /> i <br />