New Search
the both the size of the minimum penalty ($500 instead of $1,000) as well as to the <br /> substance of the Respondent's appeal. For instance, if the Respondent had realized that the <br /> City was alleging that she had violated Eugene Code 6.305(1) because tax lot 1000 was <br /> 190 square feet in excess of the maximum size she would have had an opportunity to either <br /> have the property surveyed or to recompute the area of the parcel from its metes and <br /> bounds description. <br /> Conclusions of Law: <br /> Based on the evidence in the record, the findings of fact, and the analysis set forth above, the <br /> Administrative Civil Penalty issued to Respondent Tamara Breach is dismissed. This dismissal <br /> does not release the Respondent from compliance with Eugene Code 6.305(1) and the Hearing <br /> Official directs the Respondent to request this permit from the City of Eugene within fifteen days of <br /> the date of this Final Order and comply with the conditions of this permit thereafter. <br /> - Dated, issued, and mailed this 14th day of February, 1994. <br /> By: • I la ■/■ <br /> Gary L. D. ye re <br /> City of Eug ne Hearings Official <br /> Tamara Breach Appeal of Administrative Civil Penalty <br /> Page 5 <br />