STORMWATER <br />Was this session beneficial? Yes 34 No 13 <br />For people who don't work in this area, it was informative. Did not hear about it - <br />my work day ended at 2 p.m. Could have used a little more time. Give people more <br />information about how maintenance division will be impacted. The video machine did <br />not work for any of the presentations properly. <br />How would you rate the presentation? Excellent 7 Good 15 Average 16 Poor 3 <br />I'm aware of environmental concerns but I lost interest after lunch. Room too hot, <br />fell asleep. Too lengthy on trivia -gear more to crew level. Poor sound of video <br />equipment. Had to clean up because I was on committee. Very informative. As <br />the presentee of this session, I wasn't totally clear about what topics of this <br />subject would interest the audience - probably because I'm so familiar with it. I <br />feel Jack needed more time to explain this topic. Perhaps we as a group of people <br />living close together should reconsider how stormwater is channeled. Needed more <br />time. Too short/ speaker gave great deal of information in short time. <br />Not there. Boring. <br />FACILITIES <br />Was this session beneficial? Yes 37 No 15 <br />How would you rate the presentation? Excellent 4 Good 32 Average 14 Poor 4 <br />It was good to learn who the facilities employees are. Get more departments <br />involved also have the speaker talk louder. Interesting jobs and people lost me <br />after lunch. Room too hot fell asleep. Too lengthy on introductions - didn't <br />really learn that much about operations. Nice reacquaintance and familiarization. <br />Ben talked too much - didn't give Ron enough time - didn't allow Susan time to speak. <br />I felt Ben Bonner did a very good job of explaining this topic. It lasted too <br />long. Not there. I do not remember a presentation about facilities other then <br />introductions of the facilities workers and a few comments. <br />MAXICOM <br />Was this session beneficial? <br />Yes 40 No 12 <br />How would you rate the presentation? Excellent 7 Good 28 Average 9 Poor 2 <br />John tended to ramble. Good information to understand why we make the investment. <br />Lost me in a daze. Was that the irrigation system? If so, it was a good <br />presentation but to be perfectly honest the subject matter is not exactly riveting. <br />Room too hot fell asleep. More visual and graphics. Good use of visual aides. <br />Tim and John covered the subject very thoroughly, maybe it could have been a little <br />shorter. This session let folks think water between thoughts of Christmas trees. <br />It sounds beneficial. Not there. <br />I &I <br />Was this session beneficial? Yes 31 No 14 <br />How would you rate the presentation? Excellent 1 Good 11 Average 12 Poor 8 <br />Very difficult to hear Fred. Video was good. Very informative. Interesting <br />concept -I'm out to Lunch by now -come on 3:30. Room too hot fell asleep. <br />Presenter didn't have enough time - should be more dynamic in presentation. Most <br />interesting - -I had no idea. Video was good -not enough time left to really explain <br />subject. I felt he needed to explain more about the program before we watched the <br />video. I would never have thought pipes could come apart as shown on video. <br />