New Search
TOTAL of 71 evaluations were returned <br />SUMMARY REPORT <br />EVALUATION FORM - TRAINING DAY - DECEMBER 17, 1993 <br />AFSCME <br />Was this session beneficial? Yes 47 No 5 <br />No suggestions - I thought it was okay. Longer time. I would like to have meetings <br />like that more often here so it is easy to attend. Chose not to attend. Good for <br />update. Somewhat informative about current updates. Not enough time for <br />questions and answers. Interesting dialogue concerning issues of current review. <br />Good to communicate and stay informed. The meeting was helpful, but I felt we <br />needed more time to cover as many questions people were asking. This session let <br />rank -file discuss issues surrounding PERS. I would assume the AFSCME meeting <br />should be very beneficial as its an opportunity for union members to provide input <br />without going to union meetings. Continue the use of questionnaires. I'm a new <br />employee so any info I received was beneficial. Not there. Since I usually don't <br />attend the monthly meetings it was very informative. I like union stuff. Good to <br />get together with everybody once in a while..went smoothly..enjoyed it..monitors in <br />conference room need attention. I am supervisor so did not attend. <br />WORKSITE ENVIRONMENT <br />Was this session beneficial? <br />Yes 54 No 7 <br />How would you rate the presentation? Excellent 11 Good 27 Average 11 Poor 3 <br />I don't think it should be such a big deal. Most of it is just joking around and <br />joking around makes the work place no so serious and a lot easier to be here and <br />like it. I was expecting something other than sexual harassment information! Needed <br />more time. Was difficult to hear Chris in back of room. This subject The subject <br />is very sensitive and needs more time. Some employees simply did not get it. <br />Probably most beneficial presentation - language on tape a little bawdy however. <br />The video was informative. The HRRS reps could have stayed at their desks and we <br />would not have known the difference. Not too many people took it seriously - that's <br />probably a good indication that it's needed. This was offensive to me. Film was <br />crude and to say attendance was required forced people to endure situations with no <br />options of leaving. This topic should be addressed on a regular basis (sexual <br />harassment). Some of the material covered in the video was too blatant. Someone <br />need to be responsible for all of the tv's in the room working. Hard class for <br />large group. Needed time for questions and answers. Absolutely must reevaluate <br />my inner self and don't bring it to the job. Not enough time was allotted for this <br />session. More comments at crew level, and free flow of comments. Poor sound of <br />video equipment. Video was very good -this is an important and relevant subject - <br />additional sessions in the future are a good idea. Video problems horrible. <br />Would like to take the training class that this lhr. session covers. The <br />presentation was a little bit general. Employees need to be occasionally reminded <br />to "show sensitivity" to their co- workers. These training sessions provide several <br />examples of how each situation can be viewed differently by different people. I <br />had already been to a session before this one so everything that was discussed at <br />this one I had heard before. Not there. <br />