Administrative Orders/Rules <br /> Cover Sheet <br /> dministra 've Order Number:J~' ~ " q 5 ~'Q g <br /> riginating Deparhnent: T • ~4~-k'.S E 1'1e F..~ - . <br /> epariment Contact: L.~S L~, ~.t, lD~e-~~~. ~ Della. <br /> D+ t1~-r` <br /> hecklist of Signatures: . <br /> Dep ent Head (if applicable): <br /> <br /> . Date: <br /> City er (If applicable): <br /> Date: <br /> „ Please Forward to . ~ 4.(t0., D <br /> with Original A ative Order PNl9 - hd~i r1 <br /> ~ s Administrati a order amends the SDC rates to indude a 2.65% annual inflation increase <br /> . tb he City's SDC charges, and adjusts the capital costs used to establish the Parks SDC <br /> rat , as directed y City Coundl officers. Revisions were made.to Appendix F, of the <br /> thodologies, t Park System Charge Detail, to indude component costs not reflected in <br /> th original analy is. . <br /> Th public nt period opened-dune 20, 1995 and dosed Juty 19, 1995. Notification <br /> i~ infomration a ut the proposed changes were mailed to appro~amately 338 people <br /> id tified as pot tial interested parties. The only writterrcom-r~ent received was a few lines, <br /> _ ha dwritten on th bottom of a facsimile copy of the notification letter we mailed. We were <br /> Un ble to respon to the comment as it was incomplete (cut ofd and wee received no <br /> r ponne to our r nest for the comment to be resubmitted in its entirety. <br /> In ddition to the ublic Notice published in the Register Guard on June 20th, we extended <br /> i~ tations to the hamber of Commerce and the Lane County Home Builders Association <br /> an hosted an inf m~ational meeting to further explain the changes. Reaction from those <br /> att nding the July 5th meeting was low key to serer-neutral. <br /> have provid additional irifomTation to all individuals requesting, and have contributed to <br /> .ter understan ing of the changes through several phone conversations. <br /> <br />