New Search
From: AANDERUD Kris <br />Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 7:34 AM <br />To: HOLTS Lauri J <br />Subject: RE: question about Walama invoice #1009 (GJN100019) <br />Hi Lauri, <br />The entire Walama Invoice #1009 was charged to Grant 669. There were several challenges with the Purchase <br />Order. Long story short, all of the remaining funds on PO 2011100215 are encumbered from the NOAA grant. There <br />remains .01 cent showing on the PO that is identified by an incorrect description entered by Purchasing (it shows the <br />OWEB Grant 341 in the line description, although the funding behind it is still 669. 1 thought it would be confusing, at <br />the least, to spend any funds from the NOAA grant and have WebTOTs show the line as CO #2: 531 -9335 Grnt 341. <br />Below are the details of the payment to Walama for Invoice 1009. Although paid on several lines from the PO, it was all <br />NOAA grant funds 669. <br />Please let me know if you have any questions and sorry for the confusion. Kris <br />Unit COE ReC010 MW 0000033W8 Sources tai -line Receig SUMS: Received <br />664.7900 S <br />79 i` 1.IIf7' O S <br />769.8900 8 <br />3� <br />From: HOLTS Lauri J <br />Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 2:47 PM <br />To: AANDERUD Kris <br />Subject: question about Walama invoice #1009 (GJN100019) <br />Kris, <br />Can you help me understand what happened to the coding of the following Walama invoice ( #1009): <br />http: / /cesrvlf02 /APFi na nce /DocView. aspx ?id = 760677 &d bid = 0 <br />See also the attached file and the highlighted rows. The entire amount should have been charged to <br />100019, so I don't know what happened. Is this something that can be corrected so that I can report on <br />the correct amount for this quarter's NOAA report (due 4/10) or will it just have to wait? <br />Thanks! <br />La4wil H&U <br />E <br />