New Search
AANDERUD Kris <br />From: <br />AANDERUD Kris <br />Sent: <br />Thursday, April 05, 2012 9:43 AM <br />To: <br />HOLTS Lauri J <br />Cc: <br />SMITH Tammy D <br />Subject: <br />RE: question about Walama invoice #1009 (GJN100019) <br />Attachments: <br />image004 jpg; image003 jpg <br />Hi Lauri, <br />Tried to call and let you know what I found. Below is a snapshot of WebTOTS which shows the $7,171.96 payment from <br />531 - 9335- 61739 - 905256 -669 (GJN 100017), rather than 531 - 9335 - 61739 - 905462 -669 (GJN 100019). 1 suspect this is in <br />error as we were not charging expenses to 100017; we were using this as the mother (master) funding account. <br />I have created AJE 78580 to correct the funding from 100017 to 100019, although it will not show in WebTOTS until <br />April. I have requested that it be posted with a March date, but have not heard back from Finance. I suspect we will be <br />stuck with the April posting date, which will of course impact the reports for next quarter's reporting. <br />Hope this makes some sense. Thanks for the questions! I do appreciate the attention to detail. Kris <br />From: HOLTS Lauri J <br />Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:13 AM <br />To: AANDERUD Kris <br />Subject: RE: question about Walama invoice #1009 (GJN100019) <br />Thanks! I guess I was really confused by this because only the $664.79 and $769.89 dollar amounts are <br />showing up in the Project Detail Query that I ran, so I didn't know what happened to the rest of the <br />charges. Maybe I can run it again in a few days and it will show up. I could see how it might be confusing <br />at NOAA's end if the invoice is split between two quarterly reports... <br />Lauri <br />1 <br />City of Eugene Web TOTS <br />General ledger Account Details <br />ACK : 531 - 9335- 61739- <br />-669 <br />FY: 2012 Starting Period: 4 <br />Begn Bat <br />Program: <br />ALL PROGRAMS <br />Department: <br />Al Departnents <br />Chartt?ields <br />Frog <br />Dept <br />Appropriation Pre- Encumbrance <br />Encumbrance <br />5319335 61739 000000 669 <br />97 <br />58 <br />0100 0.00 <br />0.00 <br />5319335 61739 905256 669 <br />97 <br />58 <br />0.00 0.00 <br />0.01 <br />5319335 61739 905462 669 <br />97 <br />sa <br />0100 0.00 <br />61,095.18 <br />5319335 61739 90SSD2 669 <br />97 <br />58 <br />0.00 60,000.00 <br />0.00 <br />5319335 61739 915472 669 <br />97 <br />58 <br />0100 0.00 <br />0100 <br />531 9335 61739 915552 669 <br />97 <br />58 <br />0.0€7 0.00 <br />52,822.81 <br />5319335 61739 925412 669 <br />97 <br />58 <br />0.00 35,983.00 <br />0100 <br />Totals: <br />0.00 95,983.00 <br />113,918.00 <br />From: HOLTS Lauri J <br />Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:13 AM <br />To: AANDERUD Kris <br />Subject: RE: question about Walama invoice #1009 (GJN100019) <br />Thanks! I guess I was really confused by this because only the $664.79 and $769.89 dollar amounts are <br />showing up in the Project Detail Query that I ran, so I didn't know what happened to the rest of the <br />charges. Maybe I can run it again in a few days and it will show up. I could see how it might be confusing <br />at NOAA's end if the invoice is split between two quarterly reports... <br />Lauri <br />1 <br />