New Search
WEISS Cela M <br />From: <br />DONAHUE Tammy G <br />To: <br />WEISS Cela M <br />Subject: <br />FW: contract 92 -00734 <br />Date: <br />Friday, July 17, 1998 2:36PM <br />Pending file <br />From: FIELAND Kate A <br />To: ETTER John F <br />Cc: MEDLIN Johnny R; DONAHUE Tammy G <br />Subject: RE: contract 92 -00734 <br />Date: Tuesday, November 12, 1996 2:13PM <br />This is your note from October 11th. Has anything happened around this contract in the last month ... would like to <br />get it off my desk. Thanks Kate <br />From: ETTER John F <br />To: FIELAND Kate A <br />Cc: MEDLIN Johnny R; DONAHUE Tammy G <br />Subject: RE: contract 92 -00734 <br />Date: Friday, October 11, 1996 10:03AM <br />The act of extending this agreement obviously got dropped <br />somewhere. Knowing Bob Suess I am sure that it is still in <br />effect in both of our minds, and that we do need to finish <br />drafting an extension. The attorney .who worked on this last <br />time is no longer with the City Attorney's office. They are <br />checking to see who I should direct the task of updating the <br />agreement to. I will try to get the task completed when they <br />give me the person to whom the task should be directed. <br />- -John <br />From: FIELAND Kate A <br />To: ETTER John F <br />Cc: DONAHUE Tammy G <br />Subject: contract 92 -00734 <br />Date: Thursday, October 10, 1996 1:45PM <br />I have a note from you in this contract with Robert Seuss <br />stating that the City Attorney was working on an'extension. <br />The note was dated in January of 1994. 1 have nothing further <br />in this contract concerning the Suess Recreation Easement <br />agreement. Am I to assume that nothing ever happened and the <br />easement is no longer in effect and that I can now deep -six <br />the contract? <br />Page 1 <br />