New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
BJE 68369
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
JEs
>
BJEs
>
BJE 68369
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2010 3:41:05 PM
Creation date
8/9/2010 3:19:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Journal Entry
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GL_Project_Number
975232
Identification_Number
68369
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AANDERUD Kris <br />From: MEDLIN Johnny <br />Sent: Monday, r, October 19, 2009 6:47 AM <br />To: BJOR LUND Neil H; I ISDAL Lacey L: AANDERUD Cris <br />Cc: LE CAT Sand! <br />Subject: RE: Progress Billing for Spencer Butte & Jefferson Fields <br />Agreed. - Johnny <br />From: BJILND Neil H <br />Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2009 3:47 P <br />To: RISDAL Lacey L; MEDLIN Johnny ; AANDE UD kris <br />: LEAT Sandi E <br />Subject: FEE: Progress Billing for Spencer Butte & Jefferson Fields <br />I'm in full agreement with Lacey on moving the balance to the artificial turf replacement project. <br />Neil <br />From: T I DAL Lacey L <br />Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 -:o PSI <br />To: MEDLIN Johnny R; AANDE UD Kris; BIORKLUND Neil H <br />: LEAT Sandi E <br />Subject: E: Progress Billing for Spencer Butte & Jefferson Fields <br />I would recommend that once we make sure all the bills are paid for the construction of the new fields, that any remaining funds be <br />moved to the project that is holding the $IM for replacement of existing turf. We have stated that the $1M will probably not be <br />sufficient to replace the current turf due to the underestimating of replacement + inflation. This would allow us to close out the <br />Bethel & 4J projects when they are complete, and beep the remaining sports field funding in an account that is earmarked ed for turf <br />replacement. Moving the funding back to a mother account gives the' impression that it is un- obligated /un- earmarked. <br />That's my two cents, <br />Lacey, x8351 <br />From: MEDLIN Johnny . <br />Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 1:17 P <br />To: AANDERUD Kris; 13JORKLUND Neil H <br />: LEAT Sandi E; TIDAL Lacey L <br />Subject: E: Progress Billing for Spencer Butte & Jefferson Fields <br />I would prefer not to move this out of a "ball field" oriented account thus jumping categories until more discussion happens. <br />Johnny <br />Front: AANDEID Kris <br />Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 12:17 P <br />`1": 13JOILND Neil H <br />: MEDLIN Johnny ; LE AT Sandi E; RISDAL Lacey L <br />Subject: E: Progress Billing for Spencer Butte & Jefferson Fields <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.