New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
FY10 SB3 1X$ Grant Capital
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Operating
>
2010
>
FY10 SB3 1X$ Grant Capital
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2011 12:45:16 AM
Creation date
5/7/2010 4:28:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Supplement Budget
Fiscal_Year
2010
PW_Division
Engineering
GL_Fund
341
GL_ORG
9332
Identification_Number
69985
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The OTC was asked to revise the current focus areas for TE project selection to reflect current state and federal <br />concerns over job creation and health promotion. <br />They agreed to the following changes bold and underlined are additions; strikethr-ough-is deletion: <br />Projects that fit one or more of the following conditions will receive preference in the project selection process: <br />• Benefits a state highway or state-owned transportation facility, or multi-modal transportation facility. <br />• Benefits a rural/distressed community or Special Transportation Area (STA). <br />• Supports or augments an upcoming pm,ement preservation. STIP project, mixed use or compact <br />development, as state or regional Governor's Economic Revitalization Team effort, or a state or <br />federal Job creation /retention program. <br />• Supports a certified downtown Main Street or the downtown main street in a place of actively working <br />towards certification through the Oregon Main Street Program. <br />• Directly supports existing tourism, health promotion, or economic development efforts, or has tourism, <br />health promotion or economic development as its primary focus. <br />Agenda Item G - Urban Trail Fund <br />Under House Bill 2001, passed by the Oregon State Legislature in 2009, the Urban Trail Fund was created and <br />appropriated $1 million to develop and maintain multi-use trails for non-motorized vehicles and pedestrians <br />within urban growth boundaries and to supplement or provide links to roads, highways, footpaths, bike trails, <br />and public transit. The OTC approved the program structure and the project identification process for the first <br />cycle of the Urban Trail Fund (UTF). <br />I have attached documents setting out the Project Identification Process for 2010. The application process will <br />open on June 1 and close on July 9. The OTC directed ODOT staff that projects that showed connectivity <br />should be given preference - so we should note that wherever we can in our application(s). <br />Agenda Item P - Program Funding Levels <br />This was an interesting discussion. Apparently, ODOT had told the legislature that ODOT would have $24 <br />million in available flexible funds taking the increase in gas tax into account. ODOT staff indicated they had <br />made a mistake and that amount was only $21.4 million. However, the amount of available flexible funds turns <br />out to be only $8.6 million. This is because the legislature "spent" about $13 million for increases to support <br />Elderly and Disable transit but failed to take those appropriations out of the bottom line. The OTC stated they <br />didn't think "the legislature knew [that they had not subtracted it out] when they adopted the budget." I have <br />attached their spreadsheet - note that they are revising this. <br />The OTC now needs to determine if they want to reduce some of the discretionary funding to make the <br />available flexible funds larger. While transit is requesting the remaining flexible funds go to transit operations, <br />the OTC indicated they are leaning towards opening up the remaining flexible funds for a competitive process. <br />They stated the competitive process would target projects that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, connect <br />bike/ped or cars to transit, and provide economic benefits. <br />Agenda.pdf UTF.pdf STP projects. pdf Flex.pdf <br />Brenda Wilson <br />Intergovernmental Relations Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.