New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
GJN4676 LCOG 2010-00227
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Finance
>
Capital
>
2010
>
GJN4676 LCOG 2010-00227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2011 10:09:29 PM
Creation date
2/2/2010 2:34:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Capital
PW_Document_Type_Capital
Contracts
PW_Active
Yes
External_View
No
GJN
004676
GL_Project_Number
374676
COE_Contract_Number
2010-00227
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I I <br /> 1 {j .j~ <br />I <br />f <br />From: ROYER Russ C mailto:Russ.C,Ro er@ci.eugene.or.us C - - y <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 18, ZOa91:55 PM 4 ~ To: KRUEGER Jeff; BINGHAM Tim S . <br />ff Subject: RE: Metro WW Study Land Values -Cedar Creek <br />1 <br />Sounds goad. Yes, a lump Burn would likely be sim lest. We will see what we can come u with on the S rin field p p p g <br />zonings -including same both in and out of the UGB. The E30 should be about the same as Eugene area. Marginal <br />lands tend to be either 1D ar 2D acre home sites depending on the zoning of the adjacent properties, so they are <br />typically higher values. Anyway we will see what we can find. What is your timing for these? Thanks. Russ <br />From: KRUEGER Jeff [maiito:JKrue er ico .or ~ <br />Sent: Wednesday, November ~8, 2DD9 ~.1:1D AM <br />i ~ To: RnYER Russ C; BINGHAM Tim S <br />Subject: RE: Metro WW Study Land Values -Cedar Creek <br />Hi Russ. Yes, we can set something up. V11e have a not to exceed $4,OD0 on our sub-contracting, so we just need to stay within that amount. I don't believe we're using any of that funding <br />to pay for Sprinfield staff time. <br />I can have our fiscal Talks set up a simple IGA for this. You could either bill us monthly or as a lump sum probably <br />easiest} when your work is complete. Sound like a plan? <br />Thanks, Jeff. - I <br />i <br />rom, uss mai to.Russ. ~Ro er ci. _ y ene.or usl eug.._..... <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 9:08 AM To: BINGHAM Tim S E <br />Cc: KRUEGER Jeff <br />' Subject: RE: Me~o WW Study Land Values - Cedar Creek ` <br />Goad morning. Yes, we should be able to assist on the Springfield budget estimates of land values under the different <br />zanin s. The ML is likel mar final lands. We'd have to veri the RC and RPI" as well. I have been meanin to et back . t g Y g fY g g <br />to you to see if you had a preference an haw we can bill time far this research. Please let me know if you have an idea <br />on the best way to approach that. I will also talk with someone here in our contracting section. Seems you mentioned <br />~I we may just be~ able to send you a billing invoice for the previous work. if so I wondered how it should be referenced or <br />specifics needed to be an the invoice. Anatheraption might be to create an lGA and then bill hours on a monthly <br />statement basis up to a predetermined maximum?? Thanks. Russ <br />From: BINGHAM Tim S [mailto.TBINGHAM~icoQ.ora] <br />Sent: Tuesday, November i7, 2DD9 fi:2D PM To: RCYER Russ C <br />Cc: KRUEGER Jeff <br />Subject: Metro WW Study Land Values -Cedar Creek <br />Hi Russ, <br />We have turned are attention to the Cedar Creek side of the project and have identified the fallowing zoning categories of affected sands. Gould you help provide cost ranges for these? <br />As a reminder, you and your staff working. on this can <br />charge time to the Metro WWs study. Let us know, OK? <br />i <br />Affected Land Outside UGB <br />RR-5 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.