New Search
Aci~m~aistrat7[Ye Orders/I2ules <br />Cover Sheet <br />Ad[mius~i~izve Order Numlaer: d Z - ~ - <br />. ~ Orag~nating De ent: ~ ~u->oJ~1G D - . <br />--.: Depar>trnent Contact: ~L~~a. (XSZ~f/ 1:d~ J,c,~~N l~°-~k68z.3 <br />_ .y - <br />-_ - - ~ . <br />chec:kvst ®f Signatures; <br />~epa>e>finent:Head (if applicable): ~~,( _ - _ <br />-Date: _5113a / R_ 7 ~ ~ - <br />City I1~tanager Cif appli~abie): . . <br />mate: <br />. ~` _ <br />. ~'iease Forward to City Recorder's Office -. ~ _ - <br />with Or.>h~inal A ative Order ~ - <br />This Administrative Order has been reviewed by the CityAttomeys for completeness and to confirm there <br />are no Ballot Measure 47 implications: This Administrative Order amends the SDC Methodology and rates <br />-and includes the following final recommendations: <br />1. The SDC rates are being increased to respond to the increased costs of constructing public facili#ies <br />#o serve new development. The. SDC rates have' been modified from the original January, 1997 <br />proposal, based in part, on public comments- received and subsequent staff review (page 5 of. Exhibit <br />B, AdditionaF Findings, SDC Rate Table). <br />2. The- system cost tables and Appendix G formulas are incorporated into the revised recommended - <br />SDC rates {SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). <br />3_ The underlying methodology. adopted ire 1991 is not changing; text is being reformatted for clarity and <br />ease of future updates (SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). <br />4. Future adjustments will be completed pursuant to EC 2.019 and 2.020 and will not be based on the <br />Engineering News Record publication (page 6, section 2.3,: SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). <br />5. The threshold-for change of use, with respect to Transportation SDC review,. will not change from 3,000 <br />to 1,000 square feet (page 2, 2,1 (2) (d) SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). <br />6. Detention faciiities.are no longer eligible for sformwater SDC credit (E-4, SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). <br />7. As proposed in January, 1997 private facilities constructed'to mitigate the developments impact shall <br />have a sustainable life of 20 years verses the current 10 years, the administrative,rate is decreasing <br />from 7.25 to 5%; the administrative charges collected for any single permit will be capped. at $30,000 <br />(maximum)., and two categories of development types were removed from the trip generation rate table <br />(SDC Methodology, Exhibit A). <br />The public comment period opened January 21; 1997 and closed February 20; 1997. CoPies'of the current <br />and proposed SDC Methodology documents were'posted in four locations. Notification about the public <br />comment period and proposed changes was mailed to approximately 140 persons identified on the <br />interested parties mailing list. Information was. placed in the PIC Bulletin with circulation of approximately <br />250 persons. Public information included a legal advertisement, display advertisement, news release, and <br />public information sessions for public outreach to local stakeholders. A fact sheet was available that <br />addressed-the scope of the changes and the effecton cost of development in Eugene. relative to other <br />...Oregon jurisdictions: 1,mpiementation was delayed from March 1, i 997 to May 1, 1997 in order to evaluate <br />the written comments and to discuss issues raised by the original SDC task force members who are now in <br />support. of the chariges. Notification of the May 1, 1997 implementation date was also mailed fo the same <br />.two mailing lists on April 14, 1997. < ' ` <br />