City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2007 Oregon Legislative Session City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2007 Oregon Legislative Session <br /> B4. Assessement and Taxation Appeals, money is placed in the City's General Fund and is used to provide essential services; <br /> Funding and Standards including police services and fire protection. <br /> Assessment and Taxation Funding Although the assessment and taxation (A <br /> Support statewide standards for assessment and and T) function is carried. out at the county The 2005 Legislature attached a budget note to the OLCC budget calling <br />for a study of <br /> taxation services to ensure that assessment <br /> records are correct and up-to-date, and thus can level, the results are important to cities, how local governments utilize state shared revenue. The City. <br />is participating in this survey <br /> be used to provide accurate calculations of particularly in apost-Measure 50 and subsequent discussions, and will continue to emphasize that local control <br />of this <br /> propertytaxrevenue. environment. Cities have always relied on revenue is critically important. <br /> Support stable and dedicated sources of county tax collections for city property <br /> statewide funding for assessment and taxation taxes; now they must rely on the Recommendation <br /> activities. completeness and accuracy of the ~ Support any effort to increase the amount ofstate shared revenues sent to local <br /> Oppose a shift to the cities for funding of county assessment process to ensure that they governments and strongly oppose any action that would reduce current funding <br /> assessment and taxation activities unless an receive the full amount of property taxes /eve/S. <br /> additional source of revenue is identified. due. If, for example, the county assessor ~ Strongly oppose any action by the State to direct or restrict the use <br />ofstate shared <br /> Support a requirement that cities be notified of does not add new properties to the rolls, revenue by cities. <br /> appeals ofnon-residential assessed value. does not adjust assessments for major <br /> improvements or if the market value of C2. Ability to Charge for State-Mandated Services <br /> properties are not kept up-to-date, Cities should be allowed to recover the full cost of providing a service when performing <br /> additional revenue loss could occur. mandated activities on behalf of the State. The State may have an interest in setting <br /> guidelines for the fees charged by local government, but cities should be able to request <br /> <br /> The counties have taken the position that they need help with funding the A and T function.. fee increases when their documented costs exceed State recommendations. <br /> <br /> Assessors say that declining county revenues have resulted in fewer staff, particularly <br /> appraisers. They have sought a stable funding source for A and T activities and, in C3. Disbursement of State Fines and Fees <br /> particular, have proposed that cities, schools and special districts share in the cost of The burden of uncollected fineslfees should be shared equally between <br /> the State and the <br /> property tax administration. City. <br /> In addition, appeals of assessed property value may result in loss of taxable value within .Recommendation ' <br /> the city and subsequent loss of tax revenue. This is of particular concern to the City of ~ Support any effort to allow cities and the State to equitably distribute <br />anymonies <br /> Eugene and other cities which have a substantial portion of their taxable valuation collected, so that the burden ofuncollected monies is shared byboth. <br /> provided byhigh-technology facilities which may be subject to extreme swings in assessed <br /> value. Unexpected reductions of assessed values in such cases can have damaging C4. Ability to Recoup Costs of State Collections <br /> effect on local services. In order to anticipate changes in taxable valuation,. cities should When the City acts as a collection agent for the State, it should be allowed <br />to retain its <br /> be notified of appeals of assessed value for non-residential property. legitimate overhead costs before forwarding funds to the State. consistent with City <br /> collections of County court assessments. <br /> Recommendations <br /> ~ Support statewide standards forassessment and taxation services to ensure that C5. Fee for Services to Tax-Exempt Organizations <br /> assessment records are correct and up-to-date, and thus can be used to provide Cities should be allowed to collect payments in lieu of property taxes for municipal <br />services <br /> accurate calculations of <br /> property tax revenue.. provided totax-exempt organizations. <br /> ~ Support stable and dedicated sources of statewide funding for assessment and , <br /> taxation activities. C6. Payment in Lieu of Taxes for Police, Fire and Emergency Medical Services <br /> ~ Oppose any shift to cities for funding of county assessment and taxation activities Provided toState-Owned Property <br /> unless an additional source ofrevenue is identified. The League of Oregon Cities is supporting legislation to require State agencies with <br /> ~ Support a requirement that cities be notified ofappeals ofassessed value fornon- property within a city's boundaries to make Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILOTS) <br /> residential property. Cities should be given a formal opportunity to comment on the equivalent#o the portion of the city's taxes that goes to support police, fire <br />and emergency <br /> record.. medical services. <br /> C. OTHER LOCAL BUDGET CONCERNS As an example, State-awned properties with an estimated assessed value of about $400 <br /> C1. State Shared Revenue million receive police, fire and emergency medical services provided by the City of Eugene, <br /> The provision of police, fire, planning, zoning and other services. make the Ciry eligible to yet are exempt from payment of property taxes to help support those services. <br /> Other <br /> receive these funds from the State.. The Ciry receives approximately $2.5 million each Oregon cities, like Salem, with many State-owned properties, face similar demands <br />for <br /> fiscal year in state shared revenue from cigarette, beer and wine and liquor sales. This services. <br /> 12 13 <br /> i <br /> <br />