New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
City Streets: Investing in a Neglected Asset
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
City Streets: Investing in a Neglected Asset
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 12:36:03 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:31:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Road Repair
PW_Subject
Road Repair
Document_Date
3/31/2007
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF JOHN DAY <br />hi November 2006 the city of John Day <br />entered into an intergovernmental <br />agreement with Grant County Road <br />Department to reconstruct a dangerous <br />intersection within the city limits of John <br />Day. However, the county is now unsure <br />of its ability to perform these services due <br />to the uncertain future of the Secure Rural <br />Schools Act. <br />The city of John Day now has several <br />streets that are in need of repair. 'The city <br />has reconstructed two major streets in the <br />city during the past three years using the <br />safety net funds received from the county. <br />~~~ - <br />~_ <br />To help the city manage the coed resour essthe c ty cannot spend the money on the contracted <br />maintenance plan. Due to hm <br />technical services needed to conduct a street maintenance plan. <br />Out of the 13.5 miles of city streets, over 50 percent are not in compliance with the adopted <br />transportation system plan. Of this 50 percent, the street surface is nothing more than chip seal <br />over native or gravel surface. This is a large task for a small city with diminishing financial <br />resources. <br />John Day's Critical Street Project List: <br />1. Charolais Heights Intersection: Condition - In need of safety improvements. <br />Estimated Cost: $450,000. <br />2 15`, 2nd, 3'd, 4`h, and 5`h Streets: Condition - In need of total reconstruction. <br />Estimated Cost: $2.5 million. <br />3. Brent Street: Condition - In need of total reconstruction. Estimated Cost: $600,000. <br />4. Downtown Core: Condition -Need underground utilities. Estimated Cost: $1,516.256. <br />City Streets: Case Studies -Page 30 <br />CITY OF LA GRANDE <br />In the last six years, the percentage of La Grande's streets in `fair to good" condition has <br />decreased by 6 percent, and the annual costs needed to improve these streets increased by $2-3 <br />million. <br />LA GRANDE QUICK FACTS <br />• 2006 Population: 12,540 <br />(an increase of 1 percent in 10 years) <br />• Funding Need: An additional $800,000 to $1,000,000 annually is <br />needed to maintain La Grande's 1801ane miles. A total cost of <br />$7 million is needed to bring all streets up to "good" condition. <br />• Highway 30 goes through the city's downtown, and crosses Highway 82 within city limits <br />• Local Economy: Higher Education -Eastern Oregon University (1,159 employees). <br />Manufacturing -Boise Cascade (680 employees). Union Pacific Railroad (310 <br />employees). Mixed-Commercial. <br />According to a recent private evaluation, La Grande's transportation system needs $7 million for <br />improvement and maintenance projects. La Grande's paved streets are already strained by the <br />temperature swings from 0 degrees in the winter to 110 degrees in the summer, but the lack of <br />funding has made it impossible for La Grande to adequately maintain its streets year round. <br />In 1997 La Grande's pavement management system rated 37 percent of city streets in fair to good <br />condition -that number has declined to 31 percent in 2006. This means a large majority of city <br />streets are below fair condition, and are in <br />need of major rehabilitative work, possibly <br />total reconstruction. <br />La Grande prioritizes street projects using a <br />pavement management system, the S.O.S. <br />system, and a street maintenance committee. <br />A list of needed street projects is drafted <br />using the S.O.S. system, and the street <br />maintenance committee prioritizes the <br />projects based on the needs of the <br />community. Collector and arterial streets are <br />often a higher priority than minor streets, <br />resulting in a further deterioration of La <br />Grande's residential streets. <br /> <br />City Streets: Case Studies -Page 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.