New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
City Streets: Investing in a Neglected Asset
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
City Streets: Investing in a Neglected Asset
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2009 12:36:03 PM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:31:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Administration
PWA_Project_Area
Road Repair
PW_Subject
Road Repair
Document_Date
3/31/2007
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF GARIBALDI <br />The city received a $25,000 Small City Allotment grant to pave Cypress Street in front of <br />Garibaldi Elementary School, but cannot apply for the ODOT city allotment grant for another <br />two years. <br />Garibaldi has afive-year maintenance plan including tentative paving priorities. The City <br />Council and the public considered several funding options at a town hall meeting, including a gas <br />tax and a street impact fee. Voters rejected a levy that would have charged 69 cents per $1,000 <br />assessed value on the November 2006 General Election ballot. <br />The 2006 street levy was not the city's first attempt at a street levy. h11992, voters approved a <br />three-year, $50,000 levy for paving and improving city streets. During the next seven years, the <br />city was able to pave or re-pave 40 blocks. The levy returned Garibaldi's street system to "good <br />condition," but the city has since struggled to pay for street maintenance and preservation. The <br />city must acquire funds for reconstruction and preservation costs because it now has 50 blocks of <br />deteriorating asphalt. <br />The city has utilized other funding options. The transportation SDC.helped Garibaldi improve <br />new-growth areas but there has not been much growth. The city also implemented an urban <br />renewal district to help generate funds long term for improvements in the commercial zone. <br />These two funding mechanisms have helped the city with improvements in commercial and new <br />residential neighborhoods. However, already developed areas outside of the urban renewal <br />district do not benefit from these projects. There is little revenue available for maintenance and <br />preservation of these residential areas, and there will not be any more revenue when these streets <br />deteriorate to the point of reconstruction. <br />In January, 2007, the City Council completed a franchise agreement with Tillamook PUD. The <br />agreement increased the franchise fee rate to 5 percent, with the additional 3 percent going into <br />the street fund for asphalting projects. This will net an additional $27,000 into the street fund <br />each year. With diminishing resources, Garibaldi must find alternatives to maintain and improve <br />its' streets so it can continue to be an economically thriving community. <br />CITY OF GRESHAM <br />Due to insuj~cient revenue, Gresham's deferred street maintenance costs have been increasing <br />dramatically: $1.5 million in 1997; $23 million in 2006; and if current funding trends continue, <br />$257 million by 2025. <br />GRESHAM QUICK FACTS <br />• 2006 Population: 97,745 <br />(an increase of 23 percent in 10 years) <br />• Funding Need: An additional $4 million annually is needed to <br />maintain Gresham's 800 lane miles. A total cost more than $23 <br />million is needed to bring all streets up to "good" condition. <br />• Highway 26 runs through. Gresham, <br />• Local Economy: Boeing (1,200 employees), Albertsons Distribution Center (565 <br />employees). Technology- ON Seminconductor (550 employees), Microchip Technology <br />(298 employees). <br />Transportation funding in Gresham is diminishing, and will be in the "red" in 3 to 6 years <br />depending on forecasts. The city would need $4,208,137 per year to prevent the street condition <br />from worsening, or $11,529 per day. Currently, the city of Gresham spends $2,356 per day. <br />Gresham Street Fund Revenue FY 05-06 <br />Other Revenue <br />M It h C F d' <br />Due to a severely stressed general fund that must <br />support core services, such as public safety, the <br />city's street fund receives no supplemental revenue <br />from the general fund. Beyond the revenue <br />received by the State Highway Fund, the only other <br />revenue sources for the street fund are a portion of <br />the franchise fees (to fund street lights), <br />transportation systems development charges (to <br />fundgrowth-related capital improvements) and <br />grants. The city receives a portion of Multnomah <br />County's 3-cent gas tax, which partially pays for <br />the maintenance of former county arterials. <br />~_1; u noma ounty un ing Despite these different revenue sources, Gresham's <br />State Highway Fund Revenue deferred maintenance costs have been increasing: <br />$1.5 million in 1997; $23 million in 2006; and if <br />current funding trends continue $257 million by 2025. As a result of the declining revenues,. the <br />condition of Gresham's streets is deteriorating. All of the city's capital maintenance has been <br />spent onpreservation, not reconstruction. The city's cost-effective philosophy is to spend limited <br />City Streets: Case Studies -Page 26 City Streets: Case Studies -Page 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.