These projects have originated from long-range master plans and/or City Council goals and <br />policies, or have a high priority based on City operational needs. <br />It should be noted that the costs given for unfunded projects are only preliminary budget <br />planning costs and are, for the- most part, not based on detailed design cost estimates. <br />Funding <br />For the last several years, the City's General Fund has been the primary source of funding for <br />Building Facilities and Park Site Renovations. Since General Fund revenues have not kept up <br />with service and capital requirements, the Building and Park Facilities have been consistently <br />underfunded. <br />In November 1999, the Budget Committee adopted a new General Capital Budget strategy <br />when it approved the General Fund's Six-Year Financial Forecast as the basis of the <br />development of the FY01 General Fund budget. The strategy to fund building repair and <br />reconstruction includes implementation of .three approaches: <br />1: Budget $1.7 million in the FY01 General Capital Budget and increase the budgeted <br />amount by $100,000 per year in successive years throughout the six-year forecast <br />period; <br />2. Dedicate up to $900,000 in end-of--year General Fund balances to facilities <br />maintenance; <br />3. Refer a series of general obligation bonds to voters to pay for major reconstruction or <br />improvements to City facilities. <br />In 1995, the City Council adopted a Facility Condition Report (FCR) process, which establishes <br />baseline data about the condition of facilities supported by the General Fund through a <br />detailed, structured inspection process. All capital building and facility projects in the General <br />Fund are assessed and prioritized on the basis of this report. The 1997 FCR noted <br />improvements in those facilities with moderate deficiencies, and little change in those facilities <br />that were in either good or poor condition. The current level of funding is not closing the <br />deferred maintenance gap for General Fund facilities. <br />The FCR process found not only a substantial deferred maintenance backlog, but that several <br />facilities-particularly recreation facilities-need substantial upgrades to meet current service <br />demands. Increases in building inventory over the next few years (911 center, new library) <br />suggest that capital budget reinvestment in facilities will need to increase simply to <br />accommodate these increases in square footage. Increased funding to meet these needs would <br />still not address the backlog of deferred maintenance. <br />City of Eugene 2002-2007 Capital Improvement Program <br />Page 26 <br />