I <br /> j management guidelines. Under those guidelines, the City can issue net direct debt equal to no <br /> more than $350 per capita, 3.0% of personal income and 1.5% of assessed value. These limits <br /> are more appropriate for determining the affordable level of debt that could be issued under the <br /> CIP. As of June 30, 2002, the City's debt per capita was at $263, debt to personal income was <br /> 0.4% and debt to assessed value was 0.5%. Net direct debt is defined as any debt issue that has a <br /> direct call upon the City's tax revenues (excluding tax increment revenues). Net direct debt <br /> includes all of the City's general obligation bonds except for the Airport issue that will be paid <br /> from Airport revenues beginning in FY03, and 50% of the Atrium bonds. The City excludes the ` <br /> <br /> :~i pension bonds from the definition of net direct debt. <br /> The City's debt ratios have an impact on its credit rating. The City is rated "Aa2" by Moody's <br /> Investors Service. When Moody's last evaluated the City's credit, it noted that: <br /> The city's overall debt burden is low [e]ven with [the proposed issuance of <br /> additional general obligation bonds for parks and open space and a new fire station], debt <br /> levels will remain low and very manageable. <br /> The City's low debt burden is one of its credit strengths. ; : <br /> Projected Debt Burden ' <br /> i <br /> j The City has net direct debt outstanding of $36.9 million as of June 30, 2002, excluding the <br /> pension bonds. Two additional general obligation bonds have been approved by voters and are <br /> scheduled for issuance during FY03 $8.68 million for Fire Projects and $6.305 million for <br /> Parks & Open Spaces. At the end of FY03, assuming issuance of both of these bonds, the City <br /> would have a net direct debt per capita of $333, which is very close to the $350 limit in the debt <br /> policies. The City's debt to personal income would be 0.5% and the debt to assessed value <br /> f would also be 0.5%. <br /> I <br /> Projections of debt capacity indicate that there is only a limited amount of additional capacity for <br /> debt issuance during the CIP period because of the debt per capita limit. By FY09, it is <br /> estimated that the City could incur an additional $18 million of net direct debt and stay within <br /> the current policy guideline of $350 of debt per capita. The CIP includes almost $254 million of <br /> unfunded projects, which greatly exceeds the estimated $18 million of available debt capacity the ' <br /> i <br /> City will have over the six-year CIP period. Some of these projects would most likely require <br /> debt issuance in order to be fully funded. The proposed Police Headquarters and City Hall <br /> replacement, for instance, are unlikely to be funded without issuance of general obligation bonds. <br /> If the City issued bonds to finance all of the unfunded projects during the CIP period, the City's , . <br /> net direct debt would rise to almost $250 million by FY09. The resulting debt per capita would <br /> be approximately $1,600, debt to personal income would be approximately 2.5% and debt to <br /> assessed value would be approximately 2.1 <br /> City of Eugene 2004 - 2009 Capital Improvement Program <br /> .Page 12 ~ <br /> <br />