New Search
i <br /> i <br /> 02 ~I <br /> ~P I <br /> See page 20 for definitions ~ <br /> Implementation Plan ~oa~ s~~ ~y,~~ Q~~~ <br /> 5 Q O <br /> <br /> Skinner Butte Park Master Plan ACTION ACTION VOL. POSSIBLE COST <br /> PRIORITY TYPE OPPS. NOTES PROJECT STAGES TIMELINE FUNDS ESTIMATE <br /> C. Re-develop the existing Child C_~rc, Inc- building as a park Alternatively, consider other re-use or f <br /> host far_ility In conjunction ~Nith re-development of the west end 1 j * removal of the structure * * ~ * 2002 SVD TBD <br /> rscc Action 4.4) i <br /> D. Consider removing the utility pale located just east of the The pole negatively impacts the view of <br /> Facilities buildings on the south side of Cheshire Ave. the park from the historic picnic area <br /> 3 I above the stone walls, as well as several * * * * 2010 TBD TBD <br /> other important views within the park. <br /> Feasibility research required. <br /> I <br /> E. ~~se~rch grad irnptemcnt bays iv mIt1~7aEe imparts of i-'tt?S Impacts from I-105 include the west end <br /> 3 ~~I and across the river * * * * 2010 TBD TBD <br /> 1. Work with the Oregon Department of Transportation on research and exporation of options <br /> i2. Explore ways to mitigate noise impacts from the E-W stretch of I-105 north of the Willamette River and across from Skinner Butte Park, as well as the N-S section to the west <br />of the park. Noise impacts <br /> :from both sections are substantial and affect the quality of experience in the park. <br /> i3. Consider analysis and/or research of previous analyses to determine practicality of possible solutions <br /> F4. One option to mitigate noise impacts from the E-W stretch of I-105 may include installation of jersey barriers on park side of fteeway to block the bulk of tire noise from <br />north or east bound traffic without <br /> ;blocking views of drivers to river and park <br /> 5. Consider neighborhood-initiated and maintained alternative planting schemes along the east bank of the freeway berm of the N-S section of I- 105, with consideration for the <br />potential solar needs of the <br /> :community farm proposal, if applicable ' <br /> i6. Explore options for addressing suspected polluted runoff from the N-S section of I-105 on-site in bio-swales or other landscape features (see Action 4.4 and Management Unit <br />Hl3) <br /> I <br /> Strategy: Develop and apply design standards for all built facilities and infrastructure that reflects and emphasizes the <br /> park's historic context <br /> I <br /> A. r u ~s~ a i iu <br /> r3Atiii a rii sandiarasrocur utsan~~ RED <br /> ph~asizes a atyl3stic nn , themaEiC V ~~iEh the <br /> 2005 TBD $15,000 <br /> ura(~,~ etc POL <br /> , <br /> B. Emphasize the permanence and timeless quality of CCC or <br /> State/National parks, or the rustic quality of early western 1 CR <br /> settlement <br /> ICI <br /> C. Include appropriate design standards also for lighting, park <br /> furniture, paved surraces, signage, traffic controls, and all 1 CR <br /> other aspects of the built environment <br /> D. Include a range or choice of colors, scales, materials, styles <br /> and explore particular identifiable features that will be 1 CR <br /> associated with Skinner Butte Park <br /> Strategy: Improve and maintain pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular traffic circulation patterns to emphasize alternative <br /> • transportation, accessibility and safety <br /> 6. ~ SKINNER BUTTE PROMENADE: Explore the developmen See Draft Master Plan drawing for II <br /> of a clear and convenient pedestrian promenade from conceptual guidelines <br /> downtown via the summit of Skinner Butte and Lamb <br /> Cottage to the Willamette River. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Imp~ ation ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1Q ~ ~ ~ ~ _ <br /> _._'Janu~ _ . _~2 <br /> <br />