New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Effectiveness of Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation to Reduce Infilration and Inflow Feb 2004
COE
>
PW
>
Admin
>
Execs
>
Executive non-confidential
>
Historical
>
Effectiveness of Wastewater Collection System Rehabilitation to Reduce Infilration and Inflow Feb 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2009 11:15:22 AM
Creation date
6/1/2009 12:27:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Exec
PW_Division_Exec
Engineering
PWA_Project_Area
Wastewater
PW_Subject
Wastewater
Document_Date
2/29/2004
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the entire Amazon Basin (Node 4278 at the intersection of 22°d Ave. and Amazon Parkway); <br />~ .. and, at a sub-basin level by comparing flows monitored at four major sub-basins. <br />The systemwide comparison conducted in the analysis described in this report was performed <br />on a seasonal basis, comparing total volume versus total rainfall over entire pre- and post- <br />rehabilitation wet-seasons. The event analysis compared RDII volume and rainfall occurring <br />over specific event periods. To determine a percent reduction of RDII on an event basis, <br />multiple pre- and post-rehabilitation events were plotted on a scatterplot with RDII volume on <br />the Y-axis and rainfall volume on the X-axis. A linear regression line was developed for both <br />the pre- and post-rehabilitation groups of events. The difference in slope of the two regression <br />lines comprised the percent reduction in RDII. <br />The event comparison generally tends to represent the effectiveness of rehabilitation on the <br />inflow component of RDII, while the seasonal comparison generally highlights the <br />effectiveness on infiltration. However, it is often difficult to distinguish between inflow and <br />infiltration when analyzing monitoring data. Inflow entering the system through pipes well <br />upstream of the monitoring location and affected by travel time and attenuation may be <br />indistinguishable from infiltration entering the sewers closer to the monitoring location. <br />Results of the pre- and post-rehabilitation in the form of percent reductions are presented in <br />Table ES-l. <br />Table ES-1 <br />Estimated Percent Reductions in RDII as a Result of Collection System Rehabilitation <br /> E/S Amazon Sub- Sub- Sub- Sub- <br /> WPCF Basin basin basin basin basin <br /> Systemw (DA) DA-21 DA-22 DA-23 DA-24 <br /> ide <br />Seasonal RDII <br /> <br />Volume vs. Rainfall 15% 40-70% N/A N/A 75% N/A <br />Event RDII Volume <br /> <br />vs. Rainfall 13% 40% 26% 43% 71% 59% <br />Event RDII Volume <br />vs. Event +7-Day 11% 39% N/A N/A N/A N/A <br />Rainfall <br />Event RDII Volume <br />vs. Event + 30-Day 8% 29% N/A N/A N/A N/A <br />Rainfall <br />Event Peak Flowrate <br />vs. Event Maximum N/A 35% N/A N/A N/A N/A <br />Rainfall Intensi <br />The reliability of the percent reduction estimates could be improved if more data were <br />available for analysis. However, in aggregate, the results conclude that rehabilitation has been <br />successful. Positive results are apparent at all three scale levels of analysis: systemwide, <br />basinwide, and sub-basin. Particularly impressive is that reductions are apparent at the <br />systemwide level given the relative size of the Amazon Basin. Systemwide results also reflect <br />successful rehabilitation efforts that have recently been implemented by the City of <br />Springfield. Springfield rehabilitation has in general proceeded in accordance with WWFMP <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.