New Search
Site Study U.S. Courthouse, Eugene/Springfield, OR Side by side comparison of sites ratings <br />SITE 1- Riverfront ~ SITE 2-Chiquita ~ SITE 3-Gateway ~ SITE 4A - W EWER ~ SITE 4B-E EWER ~ SITE 5-Broadway <br />m uTenu rrv nv mTe <br />Urban design SUPERIOR SUPERIOR ACCEPTABLE DEFICIENT ACCEPTABLE DEFICIENT <br /> `Strong visual prominence 'Strong visual prominence 'Visual prominence `Less visual prominence ` Vtsual prominence `Less visual prominence <br /> `Very appropriate location `Very appropriate location ' Appropriate.location 'Not appropriate location 'Appropriate location `Not appropriate location <br /> `Possible open space 'Possible open space 'Possible open space 'Possible open space 'Possible open space • Possible open space <br />Expandability SUPERIOR SUPERIOR SUPERIOR DEFICIENT ACCEPTABLE DEFICIENT <br /> 'Accommodates future 'Accommodates future `Accommodates future ' No future growth potential • Accommodates future ' No future growth potential <br /> growth growth growth growth <br />Intergovernmental SUPERIOR SUPERIOR ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE <br />opinion ' Relates to zoning/planning ` Relates to zoning/planning • Relates to zoning/planning ` Relates to zoning/planning • Relates to zoning/planning ` Relates to zoning/planning <br />Operational ACCEPTABLE SUPERIOR ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE SUPERIOR <br />Efficiency 'Good abilty to serve `Excellent abllky to serve ' Good abilty to serve 'Good ability to serve `Good ability to serve `Excellent abllky to serve <br /> court/legal community couMegai communty couNlegal communty couNlegal communky courUlegal communty court/legai communty <br />Security ACCEPTABLE SUPERIOR SUPERIOR DEFICIENT ACCEPTABLE DEFICIENT <br /> `Good setback 'Good setback 'Good setback. Security 'Setbacks not adequate. `Adequate setback. 'Setbacks not adequate. <br /> ` Prisoner trensport/holding ' Prisoner trensporUholding design criteria can be fully Security design crkeria could Securky design criteria can Security design crkeria could <br /> acceptable superior met. not lxa adequately met. be mostly met. not be adequately met. <br />Risk ACCEPTABLE SUPERIOR ACCEPTABLE DEFICIENT ACCEPTABLE DEFICIENT <br /> ' Impacts not expected to be • Impacts expected to be 'Impacts not expected to be 'Adverse impact on historic • Impacts not expected to be ' Ske not appropriate for CH <br /> signfficant. minor. significant resources-Impact expected significant 'signfficant loss of IighWiew <br /> 'Some distance from most 'Close to most Federal `Public resistance expected to be signfcant. In fioodplaln "Public resistance expected `Public resistance expected. <br /> Federal agencies. agencies. to be minor -public resistance expected. to be minor <br /> <br />Page 1 <br />